Commonwealth v. Jarowecki, 947 A.2d 713 (Pa. 2008). · Go Syfert
Search
Commonwealth v. Jarowecki, 947 A.2d 713 (Pa. 2008). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
4 citation events across 2 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Commonwealth v. Jarowecki (pa, 2009-12-30)
Top citers, strongest first. 1 distinct citer. How cited ↗
discussed Cited as authority (rule) Commonwealth v. Jarowecki (2×)
Pa. · 2009 · confidence medium
This Court granted review to address whether the grading of Jarowecki’s convictions was proper; specifically, we accepted review on the following question: “Whether the grading of the child pornography convictions at Counts 2 through 8 in a multiple counts complaint can be enhanced as a result of a child pornography conviction on Count 1?” Commonwealth v. Jarowecki, 596 Pa. 586 , 947 A.2d 713, 714 (2008) (order).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
COMMONWEALTH of Pennsylvania, Respondent
v.
Craig Scott JAROWECKI, Petitioner
409 MAL 2007.
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.
May 5, 2008.
947 A.2d 713
Per Curiam.
Cited by 2 opinions  |  Published

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

AND NOW, this 5th day of May 2008, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is GRANTED, LIMITED TO the issue set forth below. Allocatur is DENIED as to[*714] all remaining issues. The issue, rephrased for clarity, is:

Whether the grading of the child pornography convictions at Counts 2 through 8 in a multiple counts complaint can be enhanced as a result of a child pornography conviction on Count 1?