neutral
Cited (no substantive treatment)
0.2 score
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Frederick Lamont BELL, Appellant,
v.
The STATE of Florida, Appellee.
v.
The STATE of Florida, Appellee.
3D05-1173.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
Dec 27, 2006.
Wells, Suarez, and Rothenberg.
Cited by 1 opinion | Published
Clayton R. Kaeiser, Miami, for appellant.
Charles J. Crist, Jr., Attorney General, and Lucretia A. Pitts, Assistant Attorney General for appellee.
Before WELLS, SUAREZ, and ROTHENBERG, JJ.
PER CURIAM.
We affirm Fredrick Lamont Bell's conviction and sentence for attempted trafficking in cocaine as the conviction is supported by competent, substantial evidence. We also find no merit in Bell's argument[*552] regarding the jury instruction on that charge, a charge to which he did not object and which, in light of the evidence, was not erroneous in any respect.
Affirmed.