Bohannan v. Johnson, 178 F.3d 1290. · Go Syfert
Search
Bohannan v. Johnson, 178 F.3d 1290. Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
33 citation events (4 in the last 25 years) across 6 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Woodley v. Warden, FCI Berlin (nhd, 2014-06-18)
Treatment trajectory · 1999 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1999 2012 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 3 distinct citers. How cited ↗
discussed Cited "see" Woodley v. Warden, FCI Berlin
D.N.H. · 2014 · signal: see · confidence high
See United States v. Jackson, 178 F.3d 1290 , 1999 WL 236005, at *1 (5th Cir. 1999) (per curiam) (unpublished decision) (issue addressed and rejected on direct appeal could not be relitigated in § 2255 motion); Singleton v. United States, 26 F.3d 233, 240 (1st Cir. 1994) (same). 3 II.
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Illinois Central Gulf Railroad v. Travis
Miss. · 2012 · signal: see also · confidence low
See also Davis v. CSX Transp., Inc., 178 F.3d 1290 , *5 (5th Cir.1999) (engineer "ordinarily has the right to presume that the person is in possession of his faculties and that he will note the alarm being given” and "an operator need not slow a train until circumstances show that the person will probably not seek safety”); Woods v. Amtrdk, 982 F.Supp. 409, 412-13 (N.D.Miss.1997) (engineer entitled to assume that driver “would stop for an approaching train, and thus had no duty to stop or slow the train for the approaching vehicle”); Wil ner v. Miss.
discussed Cited "see, e.g." In Re: Robert E. Casse, Debtor Robert E. Casse, Debtor-Appellant v. Key Bank National Association, Creditor-Appellee
2d Cir. · 1999 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence low
See, e.g., Rowe v. Ocwen Federal Bank & Trust (In re Rowe), 220 B.R. 591, 595 (E.D.Tex.1997), aff'd without published opinion, 178 F.3d 1290 (5th Cir.1999): The bankruptcy court [ ] also stands on solid footing in refusing to void the foreclosure sale of Rowe’s house.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Bohannan
v.
Johnson
178 F.3d 1290

178 F.3d 1290

Bohannan
v.
Johnson[*]

NO. 97-10251

United States Court of Appeals,
Fifth Circuit.

April 01, 1999

Appeal From: N.D.Tex. , No.4:96-CV-326

1

Affirmed.

*

Fed.R.App.P. 34(a); 5th Cir.R. 34-2