Lawson v. Elizabethtown Gas Co., 913 So. 2d 738 (Fla. 3d DCA 2005). · Go Syfert
Search
Lawson v. Elizabethtown Gas Co., 913 So. 2d 738 (Fla. 3d DCA 2005). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
“lawson does not dispute that her notices of appeal were untimely. we must, therefore, accept the referee's findings of untimeliness and affirm the unemployment appeals commission's orders.”
4 citation events across 1 distinct court.
Strongest positive: Rostran v. Florida Unemployment Appeals Commission (fladistctapp, 2011-12-14)
Top citers, strongest first. 2 distinct citers. How cited ↗
discussed Cited as authority (verbatim quote) Rostran v. Florida Unemployment Appeals Commission
Fla. Dist. Ct. App. · 2011 · quote attribution · 1 verbatim quote · confidence high
lawson does not dispute that her notices of appeal were untimely. we must, therefore, accept the referee's findings of untimeliness and affirm the unemployment appeals commission's orders.
cited Cited "see" Exposito v. South Florida Hotels, Inc.
Fla. Dist. Ct. App. · 2007 · signal: see · confidence high
See Lawson v. Elizabethtown Gas Co., 913 So.2d 738, 738 (Fla. 3d DCA 2005); Leon v. Unemployment Appeals Comm'n, 476 So.2d 761, 761-62 (Fla. 3d DCA 1985).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Lachanda M. LAWSON, Appellant,
v.
ELIZABETHTOWN GAS COMPANY and Florida Unemployment Appeals Commission, Appellees.
3D05-1256.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
Nov 2, 2005.
913 So. 2d 738
Wells, Suarez, and Rothenberg.
Cited by 3 opinions  |  Published
1 passage pin-cited by 1 case
Pinpoint authority: bottom 61%
Citer courts: District Court of Appeal of Fl… (1)

LaChanda M. Lawson, in proper person.

John D. Maher, (Tallahassee) for appellee, Commission.

Before WELLS, SUAREZ, and ROTHENBERG, JJ.

WELLS, Judge.

Claimant Lachanda M. Lawson appeals from two orders of the Unemployment Appeals Commission. The Commission affirmed an appeals referee's dismissal of Lawson's untimely appeals from two adjudications denying her unemployment benefits. Lawson does not dispute that her notices of appeal were untimely. We must, therefore, accept the referee's findings of untimeliness and affirm the Unemployment Appeals Commission's orders. See § 443.151(3)(a), Fla. Stat. (2004)(providing that a denial of benefits "is final unless within 20 days after the mailing of the notices ... an appeal or written request for reconsideration is filed"); Leon v. Unemployment Appeals Comm'n, 476 So.2d 761, 762 (Fla. 3d DCA 1985)(confirming that failure to comply with review procedures compels dismissal of a late filed appeal).

Affirmed.