Florida Statute 443.151 - Full Text and Legal Analysis

The 2025 Florida Statutes

Title XXXI
LABOR

Chapter 443
REEMPLOYMENT ASSISTANCE

View Entire Chapter

F.S. 443.151

443.151 Procedure concerning claims.—

(1) POSTING OF INFORMATION.—

(a) Each employer must post and maintain in places readily accessible to individuals in her or his employ printed statements concerning benefit rights, claims for benefits, and other matters relating to the administration of this chapter as the Department of Commerce may by rule prescribe. Each employer must supply to individuals copies of printed statements or other materials relating to claims for benefits as directed by the rules of the department. The department shall supply these printed statements and other materials to each employer without cost to the employer.

(b)1. The department shall advise each individual filing a new claim for reemployment assistance, at the time of filing the claim, that:

a. Reemployment assistance is subject to federal income tax.

b. Requirements exist pertaining to estimated tax payments.

c. The individual may elect to have federal income tax deducted and withheld from the individual’s payment of reemployment assistance at the amount specified in the federal Internal Revenue Code.

d. The individual is not permitted to change a previously elected withholding status more than twice per calendar year.

2. Amounts deducted and withheld from reemployment assistance must remain in the Unemployment Compensation Trust Fund until transferred to the federal taxing authority as payment of income tax.

3. The department shall follow all procedures specified by the United States Department of Labor and the federal Internal Revenue Service pertaining to the deducting and withholding of income tax.

4. If more than one authorized request for deduction and withholding is made, amounts must be deducted and withheld in accordance with the following priorities:

a. Reemployment assistance overpayments have first priority;

b. Child support payments have second priority; and

c. Withholding under this subsection has third priority.

(2) FILING OF CLAIM INVESTIGATIONS; NOTIFICATION OF CLAIMANTS AND EMPLOYERS.—

(a) In general.—Initial and continued claims for benefits must be made by approved electronic or alternate means and in accordance with rules adopted by the Department of Commerce. The department shall provide alternative means, such as by telephone, for filing initial and continued claims if the department determines access to the approved electronic means is or will be unavailable and also must provide public notice of such unavailability. The department must notify claimants and employers regarding monetary and nonmonetary determinations of eligibility. Investigations of issues raised in connection with a claimant which may affect a claimant’s eligibility for benefits or charges to an employer’s employment record shall be conducted by the department through written, telephonic, or electronic means as prescribed by rule.

(b) Process.—When the Reemployment Assistance Claims and Benefits Information System described in s. 443.1113 is fully operational, the process for filing claims must incorporate the process for registering for work with the consumer-first workforce system established under s. 445.011. Unless exempted under s. 443.091(1)(b)5., a claim for benefits may not be processed until the work registration requirement is satisfied. The department may adopt rules as necessary to administer the work registration requirement set forth in this paragraph.

(3) DETERMINATION OF ELIGIBILITY.—

(a) Notices of claim.—The Department of Commerce shall promptly provide a notice of claim to the claimant’s most recent employing unit and all employers whose employment records are liable for benefits under the monetary determination. The employer must respond to the notice of claim within 14 days after the mailing date of the notice, or in lieu of mailing, within 14 days after the delivery of the notice. If a contributing employer or its agent fails to timely or adequately respond to the notice of claim or request for information, the employer’s account may not be relieved of benefit charges as provided in s. 443.131(3)(a), notwithstanding paragraph (5)(b). The department may adopt rules as necessary to implement the processes described in this paragraph relating to notices of claim.

(b) Monetary determinations.—In addition to the notice of claim, the department shall also promptly provide an initial monetary determination to the claimant and each base period employer whose account is subject to being charged for its respective share of benefits on the claim. The monetary determination must include a statement of whether and in what amount the claimant is entitled to benefits, and, in the event of a denial, must state the reasons for the denial. A monetary determination for the first week of a benefit year must also include a statement of whether the claimant was paid the wages required under s. 443.091(1)(g) and, if so, the first day of the benefit year, the claimant’s weekly benefit amount, and the maximum total amount of benefits payable to the claimant for a benefit year. The claimant may file a request for the department to reconsider a monetary determination within 20 days after the department mails the notice to the claimant’s last known address or, in lieu of mailing, within 20 days after the delivery of the notice. A monetary determination is final for a claimant if the claimant does not file a timely request for the department to reconsider the monetary determination. A monetary redetermination is final for a claimant unless within 20 days after the mailing of the notice of monetary redetermination to the claimant’s last known address or, in lieu of mailing, within 20 days after the delivery of the notice, the claimant files an appeal. The monetary determination or monetary redetermination is final for an employer or other party entitled to notice unless within 20 days after the mailing of the respective notice to the employer or party to its last known address or, in lieu of mailing, within 20 days after delivery of the notice, an appeal is filed by the employer or the party. The department may adopt rules as necessary to implement the processes described in this paragraph relating to notices of monetary determinations and the appeals or reconsideration requests filed in response to such notices.

(c) Nonmonetary determinations.—If the department receives information that may result in a denial of benefits, the department must complete an investigation of the claim required by subsection (2) and provide notice of a nonmonetary determination to the claimant and the employer from whom the claimant’s reason for separation affects his or her entitlement to benefits. The determination must state the reason for the determination and whether the reemployment assistance tax account of the contributing employer is charged for benefits paid on the claim. The nonmonetary determination is final unless within 20 days after the mailing of the notices to the parties’ last known addresses, or in lieu of mailing, within 20 days after the delivery of the notices, an appeal or written request for reconsideration is filed by the claimant or other party entitled to notice. The department may adopt rules as necessary to implement the processes described in this paragraph relating to notices of nonmonetary determination and the appeals or reconsideration requests filed in response to such notices, and may adopt rules prescribing the manner and procedure by which employers within the base period of a claimant become entitled to notice of nonmonetary determination.

(d) Determinations in labor dispute cases.—Whenever any claim involves a labor dispute described in s. 443.101(4), the department shall promptly assign the claim to a special examiner who shall make a determination on the issues involving unemployment due to the labor dispute. The special examiner shall make the determination after an investigation, as necessary. The claimant or another party entitled to notice of the determination may appeal a determination under subsection (4).

(e) Redeterminations.—

1. The department may reconsider a determination if it finds an error or if new evidence or information pertinent to the determination is discovered after a prior determination or redetermination. A redetermination may not be made more than 1 year after the last day of the benefit year unless the disqualification for making a false or fraudulent representation under s. 443.101(6) is applicable, in which case the redetermination may be made within 2 years after the false or fraudulent representation. The department must promptly give notice of redetermination to the claimant and to any employers entitled to notice in the manner prescribed in this section for the notice of an initial determination.

2. If the amount of benefits is increased by the redetermination, an appeal of the redetermination based solely on the increase may be filed as provided in subsection (4). If the amount of benefits is decreased by the redetermination, the redetermination may be appealed by the claimant if a subsequent claim for benefits is affected in amount or duration by the redetermination. If the final decision on the determination or redetermination to be reconsidered was made by an appeals referee, the commission, or a court, the department may apply for a revised decision from the body or court that made the final decision.

3. If an appeal of an original determination is pending when a redetermination is issued, the appeal unless withdrawn is treated as an appeal from the redetermination.

(4) APPEALS.—

(a) Appeals referees.—

1. The Department of Commerce shall appoint one or more impartial salaried appeals referees in accordance with s. 443.171(3) to hear and decide appealed claims.

2. A person may not participate on behalf of the department as an appeals referee in any case in which she or he is an interested party.

3. The department may designate alternates to serve in the absence or disqualification of any appeals referee on a temporary basis. These alternates must have the same qualifications required of appeals referees.

4. The department shall provide the commission and the appeals referees with proper facilities and assistance for the execution of their functions.

(b) Filing and hearing.—

1. The claimant or any other party entitled to notice of a determination may appeal an adverse determination to an appeals referee within 20 days after the date of mailing of the notice to her or his last known address or, if the notice is not mailed, within 20 days after the date of delivering the notice.

2. Unless the appeal is untimely or withdrawn or review is initiated by the commission, the appeals referee, after mailing all parties and attorneys of record a notice of hearing at least 10 days before the date of hearing, notwithstanding the 14-day notice requirement in s. 120.569(2)(b), may only affirm, modify, or reverse the determination. An appeal may not be withdrawn without the permission of the appeals referee.

3. If an appeal appears to have been filed after the permissible time limit, the Office of Appeals may issue an order to show cause to the appellant which requires the appellant to show why the appeal should not be dismissed as untimely. If, within 15 days after the mailing date of the order to show cause, the appellant does not provide written evidence of timely filing or good cause for failure to appeal timely, the appeal shall be dismissed. However, an appeal may not be filed more than 5 years after the date of the mailing of the determination or, if the determination is not mailed, more than 5 years after the date of the delivery of the determination.

4. If an appeal involves a question of whether services were performed by a claimant in employment or for an employer, the referee must give special notice of the question and of the pendency of the appeal to the employing unit and to the department, both of which become parties to the proceeding.

5.a. Any part of the evidence may be received in written form, and all testimony of parties and witnesses shall be made under oath.

b. Irrelevant, immaterial, or unduly repetitious evidence shall be excluded, but all other evidence of a type commonly relied upon by reasonably prudent persons in the conduct of their affairs is admissible, whether or not such evidence would be admissible in a trial in state court.

c. Hearsay evidence may be used for the purpose of supplementing or explaining other evidence, or to support a finding if it would be admissible over objection in civil actions. Notwithstanding s. 120.57(1)(c), hearsay evidence may support a finding of fact if:

(I) The party against whom it is offered has a reasonable opportunity to review such evidence prior to the hearing; and

(II) The appeals referee or special deputy determines, after considering all relevant facts and circumstances, that the evidence is trustworthy and probative and that the interests of justice are best served by its admission into evidence.

6. The parties must be notified promptly of the referee’s decision. The referee’s decision is final unless further review is initiated under paragraph (c) within 20 days after the date of mailing notice of the decision to the party’s last known address or, in lieu of mailing, within 20 days after the delivery of the notice.

(c) Review by commission.—The commission may, on its own motion, within the time limit in paragraph (b), initiate a review of the decision of an appeals referee. The commission may also allow the department or any adversely affected party entitled to notice of the decision to appeal the decision by filing an application within the time limit in paragraph (b). An adversely affected party has the right to appeal the decision if the department’s determination is not affirmed by the appeals referee. The commission may affirm, modify, or reverse the findings and conclusions of the appeals referee based on evidence previously submitted in the case or based on additional evidence taken at the direction of the commission. The commission may assume jurisdiction of or transfer to another appeals referee the proceedings on any claim pending before an appeals referee. Any proceeding in which the commission assumes jurisdiction before completion must be heard by the commission in accordance with the requirement of this subsection for proceedings before an appeals referee. When the commission denies an application to hear an appeal of an appeals referee’s decision, the decision of the appeals referee is the decision of the commission for purposes of this paragraph and is subject to judicial review within the same time and manner as decisions of the commission, except that the time for initiating review runs from the date of notice of the commission’s order denying the application to hear an appeal.

(d) Procedure.—The manner that appealed claims are presented must comply with the commission’s rules. Witnesses subpoenaed under this section are allowed fees at the rate established by s. 92.142, and fees of witnesses subpoenaed on behalf of the department or any claimant are deemed part of the expense of administering this chapter.

(e) Judicial review.—Orders of the commission entered under paragraph (c) are subject to review only by notice of appeal in the district court of appeal in the appellate district in which a claimant resides or the job separation arose or in the appellate district where the order was issued. However, if the notice of appeal is filed solely with the commission, the appeal shall be filed in the district court of appeal in the appellate district in which the order was issued. Notwithstanding chapter 120, the commission is a party respondent to every such proceeding. The department may initiate judicial review of orders in the same manner and to the same extent as any other party.

(5) PAYMENT OF BENEFITS.—

(a) The Department of Commerce shall promptly pay benefits in accordance with a determination or redetermination regardless of any appeal or pending appeal. Before payment of benefits to the claimant, however, each employer who is liable for reimbursements in lieu of contributions for payment of the benefits must be notified, at the address on file with the department or its tax collection service provider, of the initial determination of the claim and must be given 10 days to respond.

(b) The department shall promptly pay benefits, regardless of whether a determination is under appeal if the determination allowing benefits is affirmed in any amount by an appeals referee or is affirmed by the commission, or if a decision of an appeals referee allowing benefits is affirmed in any amount by the commission. In these instances, a court may not issue an injunction, supersedeas, stay, or other writ or process suspending payment of benefits. A contributing employer that responded to the notice of claim within the time limit provided in subsection (3) may not, however, be charged with benefits paid under an erroneous determination if the decision is ultimately reversed. Benefits are not paid for any subsequent weeks of unemployment involved in a reversal.

(c) The provisions of paragraph (b) relating to charging an employer liable for contributions do not apply to reimbursing employers.

(6) RECOVERY AND RECOUPMENT.—

(a) Any person who, by reason of her or his fraud, receives benefits under this chapter to which she or he is not entitled is liable for repaying those benefits to the Department of Commerce on behalf of the trust fund or, in the discretion of the department, to have those benefits deducted from future benefits payable to her or him under this chapter. In addition, the department shall impose upon the claimant a penalty equal to 15 percent of the amount overpaid. To enforce this paragraph, the department must find the existence of fraud through a redetermination or decision under this section within 2 years after the fraud was committed. Any recovery or recoupment of benefits must be commenced within 7 years after the redetermination or decision.

(b) Any person who, by reason other than her or his fraud, receives benefits under this chapter to which, under a redetermination or decision pursuant to this section, she or he is not entitled, is liable for repaying those benefits to the department on behalf of the trust fund or, in the discretion of the department, to have those benefits deducted from any future benefits payable to her or him under this chapter. Any recovery or recoupment of benefits must be commenced within 7 years after the redetermination or decision.

(c) Any person who, by reason other than fraud, receives benefits under this chapter to which she or he is not entitled as a result of an employer’s failure to respond to a claim within the timeframe provided in subsection (3) is not liable for repaying those benefits to the department on behalf of the trust fund or to have those benefits deducted from any future benefits payable to her or him under this chapter.

(d) Recoupment from future benefits is not permitted if the benefits are received by any person without fault on the person’s part and recoupment would defeat the purpose of this chapter or would be inequitable and against good conscience.

(e) The department shall collect the repayment of benefits without interest by the deduction of benefits through a redetermination or by a civil action.

(f) Notwithstanding any other provision of this chapter, any person who is determined by this state, a cooperating state agency, the United States Secretary of Labor, or a court to have received any payments under the Trade Act of 1974, as amended, to which the person was not entitled shall have those payments deducted from any regular benefits, as defined in s. 443.1115(1)(e), payable to her or him under this chapter. Each such deduction may not exceed 50 percent of the amount otherwise payable. The payments deducted shall be remitted to the agency that issued the payments under the Trade Act of 1974, as amended, for return to the United States Treasury. Except for overpayments determined by a court, a deduction may not be made under this paragraph until a determination by the state agency or the United States Secretary of Labor is final.

(7) REPRESENTATION IN ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEEDINGS.—In any administrative proceeding conducted under this chapter, an employer or a claimant has the right, at his or her own expense, to be represented by counsel or by an authorized representative. Notwithstanding s. 120.62(2), the authorized representative need not be a qualified representative.

(8) BILINGUAL REQUIREMENTS.—

(a) The Department of Commerce shall provide printed bilingual instructional and educational materials in the appropriate language in those counties in which 5 percent or more of the households in the county are classified as a single-language minority.

(b) The department shall ensure that one-stop career centers and appeals offices located in counties subject to the requirements of paragraph (c) prominently post notices in the appropriate languages and that translators are available in those centers and offices.

(c) As used in this subsection, the term “single-language minority” means households that speak the same non-English language and that do not contain an adult fluent in English. The department shall develop estimates of the percentages of single-language minority households for each county by using data from the United States Bureau of the Census.

History.—s. 7, ch. 18402, 1937; CGL 1940 Supp. 4151(494); s. 7, ch. 20685, 1941; s. 1, ch. 21982, 1943; s. 2, ch. 24083, 1947; s. 10, ch. 26484, 1951; s. 4, ch. 26879, 1951; s. 4, ch. 28242, 1953; ss. 1, 2, 3, 4, ch. 29769, 1955; s. 1, ch. 57-268; s. 3, ch. 61-132; ss. 17, 35, ch. 69-106; s. 1, ch. 70-87; s. 1, ch. 72-154; s. 11, ch. 78-95; s. 4, ch. 78-386; s. 23, ch. 79-7; s. 3, ch. 79-308; s. 184, ch. 79-400; ss. 5, 8, 9, ch. 80-95; s. 4, ch. 80-345; s. 4, ch. 82-91; s. 1, ch. 82-178; s. 12, ch. 83-174; s. 3, ch. 90-89; s. 7, ch. 96-378; s. 200, ch. 96-410; s. 7, ch. 96-411; s. 1065, ch. 97-103; s. 9, ch. 98-149; s. 104, ch. 2000-153; s. 106, ch. 2000-165; s. 39, ch. 2003-36; s. 7, ch. 2005-209; s. 11, ch. 2010-90; s. 372, ch. 2011-142; s. 11, ch. 2011-235; s. 22, ch. 2012-30; ss. 46, 47, ch. 2013-39; s. 22, ch. 2014-218; s. 13, ch. 2021-25; s. 40, ch. 2021-164; s. 193, ch. 2024-6.

Note.—Former s. 443.07.

F.S. 443.151 on Google Scholar

F.S. 443.151 on CourtListener

Amendments to 443.151

Annotations, Discussions, Cases:

Cases Citing Statute 443.151

Total Results: 197

Verner v. State, Unemployment Appeals Com'n

474 So. 2d 909, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 2045

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 30, 1985 | Docket: 1749805

Cited 17 times | Published

receiving unemployment compensation benefits under section 443.151(4)(e), Florida Statutes (1983). Ms. Verner

Davis v. FLA. UNEMPLOYMENT APPEALS

472 So. 2d 800, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 1629

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 2, 1985 | Docket: 1793839

Cited 14 times | Published

decision in "M"'s case, but declined to do so. § 443.151(4)(c), Fla. Stat. (1983). The Commission's failure

Anderson v. Unemployment Appeals Com'n

822 So. 2d 563, 2002 WL 1768986

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 2, 2002 | Docket: 1757145

Cited 12 times | Published

herself of her right to appeal provided by section 443.151(4), Florida Statutes (2000). The Referee, appointed

Leon v. Unemployment Appeals Com'n

476 So. 2d 761, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 2350, 1985 Fla. App. LEXIS 16306

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 15, 1985 | Docket: 2534290

Cited 11 times | Published

jurisdiction to consider the merits of Leon's claim. § 443.151(3)(a), (4)(b), Fla. Stat. (1983); Fla. Admin.

Espinosa v. Cableoptics, Inc.

807 So. 2d 195, 2002 WL 237040

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 20, 2002 | Docket: 1505625

Cited 10 times | Published

mailed to the parties. We affirm. Pursuant to section 443.151(4)(b)3, Fla. Stat. (1997)[1], an aggrieved

Applegate v. NAT. HEALTH CARE

667 So. 2d 332, 1995 WL 619880

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 24, 1995 | Docket: 160252

Cited 9 times | Published

requirement to dismiss untimely appeals. See section 443.151(4)(b)3., Florida Statutes (1993); Fla. Admin

Thurman v. UAC

881 So. 2d 89, 2004 WL 1877360

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 24, 2004 | Docket: 1466198

Cited 8 times | Published

to file his notice of appeal with the UAC. See § 443.151(4)(b)(1), Fla. Stat. (2002).[1] In his notice

Landrum v. JAMES RUMMER TIMBER HARV.

645 So. 2d 577, 1994 WL 646338

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 18, 1994 | Docket: 1168913

Cited 7 times | Published

was mailed to Landrum on August 11, 1993. Section 443.151(4)(b)3., Florida Statutes (1993), provides

Assam v. FLORIDA UNEMPLOYMENT APPEALS

871 So. 2d 978, 2004 Fla. App. LEXIS 5205, 2004 WL 784621

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 14, 2004 | Docket: 1709432

Cited 6 times | Published

to file an appeal of the decision. Fla. Stat. § 443.151(3) and (4)(2002). Rules promulgated by the Commission

Ebersol v. UNEMPLOYMENT APPEALS COM'N

845 So. 2d 945, 2003 Fla. App. LEXIS 5824, 2003 WL 1936394

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 25, 2003 | Docket: 1728854

Cited 6 times | Published

the adverse decision of the appeals referee. Section 443.151(4)(b)3, Florida Statutes, provides that an

Microfile, Inc. v. Williams

425 So. 2d 1218

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 2, 1983 | Docket: 2534888

Cited 6 times | Published

Unemployment Appeals Commission as provided by section 443.151(4)(c), Florida Statutes (1981), and we, therefore

Garcia v. FL. UNEMPLOYMENT APPEALS COMMISSION

872 So. 2d 966, 2004 Fla. App. LEXIS 5449, 2004 WL 840164

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 21, 2004 | Docket: 1356811

Cited 5 times | Published

member Unemployment Appeals Commission. Fla. Stat. § 443.151(3) and (4). [2] Neither party called Ambrosio

Guerrero v. FLORIDA UNEMPLOYMENT APPEALS COM'N

855 So. 2d 266, 2003 WL 22239717

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 1, 2003 | Docket: 1752522

Cited 5 times | Published

that is precisely what he argues here. Under section 443.151(4)(b)3 of the Florida Statutes, an aggrieved

Frederick v. Florida Unemployment Appeals

834 So. 2d 957, 2003 WL 142091

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 22, 2003 | Docket: 1329173

Cited 5 times | Published

untimely. This appeal followed. Pursuant to section 443.151(4)(b)(3), Florida Statutes (2001), the claimant

Holmes v. City of West Palm Beach

627 So. 2d 52, 1993 WL 469813

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 17, 1993 | Docket: 1752907

Cited 5 times | Published

Commission dismissed the appeal as untimely under section 443.151(4)(b)3, Florida Statutes, and Florida Administrative

Williams v. UNEMPLOYMENT APPEALS COMM.

608 So. 2d 572, 1992 WL 338531

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 20, 1992 | Docket: 1449354

Cited 5 times | Published

conclusions of the appeals referee, pursuant to section 443.151(4)(c), Florida Statutes (1991), the Commission

Finney v. UNEMPLOYMENT APPEALS COM'N

587 So. 2d 637, 1991 WL 205846

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 16, 1991 | Docket: 160251

Cited 5 times | Published

referee's decision. The commission argues that section 443.151(4)(b)(3), Florida Statutes (1989), mandates

Lake Cnty. Sheriff's Dept. v. Unemp. App. Com'n

478 So. 2d 880

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 21, 1985 | Docket: 1484448

Cited 5 times | Published

While the UAC has the authority, pursuant to section 443.151(4)(c), Florida Statutes *882 (1983) to reverse

Parker v. DEPT. OF LABOR AND EMPLOYMENT SEC.

440 So. 2d 438

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 21, 1983 | Docket: 1728305

Cited 5 times | Published

referee and this appeal ensued pursuant to Section 443.151(4)(c), Florida Statutes. Section 443.101(1)(a)

Sagaert v. STATE, DEPT. OF LABOR, ETC.

418 So. 2d 1228

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 7, 1982 | Docket: 1685970

Cited 5 times | Published

compensation benefits that she had been overpaid. § 443.151(6)(b), Fla. Stat. (Supp. 1980). The claimant appealed

Stuart v. FLORIDA UNEMP. APPEALS COM'N

961 So. 2d 1020, 2007 WL 2000859

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 12, 2007 | Docket: 1501835

Cited 4 times | Published

the Agency's determination to the parties. Section 443.151(3)(a), Florida Statutes (2006), provides, "[t]he

Robinson v. Sun Bank and Trust Co.

685 So. 2d 1325, 1996 WL 82774

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 28, 1996 | Docket: 2538893

Cited 4 times | Published

overpayments of unemployment compensation benefits. Section 443.151(4)(b)3., Florida Statutes (1993), provides

DEPT. OF GENERAL SERV. v. English

509 So. 2d 1198, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 1567

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 26, 1987 | Docket: 1362593

Cited 4 times | Published

work" within the above statute. Pursuant to Section 443.151(4)(a), Florida Statutes (1985), English's appeal

Wyche v. FLA. UNEMPLOYMENT APPEALS

469 So. 2d 184, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 1268

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 21, 1985 | Docket: 1272582

Cited 4 times | Published

findings and conclusions of the appeals referee, section 443.151(4)(c), Florida Statutes (1983), its use of

Bagarotti v. Reemployment Assistance Appeals Commission

208 So. 3d 1197, 2017 Fla. App. LEXIS 208

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 11, 2017 | Docket: 4565897

Cited 3 times | Published

order, the Commission declined both requests. § 443.151 (4)(c), Fla, Stat. (2015). Our opinion today does

Malary v. BRINKER INTERNATIONAL PAYROLL

898 So. 2d 1184, 2005 WL 767006

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 6, 2005 | Docket: 204048

Cited 3 times | Published

to him. § 443.151(4)(b), Fla. Stat. (2003); Guerrero, 855 So.2d at 268 ("Under section 443.151(4)(b)3

Morton v. STATE, UNEMPLOYMENT APPEALS COM'N

769 So. 2d 1119, 2000 WL 1468591

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 4, 2000 | Docket: 1476301

Cited 3 times | Published

from severe medical and financial hardships. Section 443.151(6)(b), Florida Statutes (1997), specifically

Creech v. ORLANDO LEASING SYSTEMS

765 So. 2d 223, 2000 WL 1021257

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 26, 2000 | Docket: 2555123

Cited 3 times | Published

unless he filed an appeal during that period. See § 443.151(4), Fla. Stat. (1997). Thereafter, Creech filed

Linderman v. KB BEACH SUITES LTD PTR

751 So. 2d 1262, 2000 WL 276383

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 15, 2000 | Docket: 1779797

Cited 3 times | Published

twenty-five days later. The relevant statute is section 443.151(4)(b)3, Florida Statutes (1999), which reads

Delgado v. Concentrated Chemical Co.

644 So. 2d 173, 1994 Fla. App. LEXIS 10384, 1994 WL 583943

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 26, 1994 | Docket: 1672206

Cited 3 times | Published

during the statutory twenty-day time limit of section 443.151(4)(b)3, Florida Statutes (1993). Some months

Orange Bank v. UNEMPLOYMENT APPEALS COM'N

611 So. 2d 107, 1992 Fla. App. LEXIS 13132, 1992 WL 389047

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 31, 1992 | Docket: 1674203

Cited 3 times | Published

Kennedy, 390 So.2d 149 (Fla. 1st DCA 1980); § 443.151(4)(c), Fla. Stat. (1991). The referee found that

Orange Bank v. UNEMPLOYMENT APPEALS COM'N

611 So. 2d 107, 1992 Fla. App. LEXIS 13132, 1992 WL 389047

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 31, 1992 | Docket: 1674203

Cited 3 times | Published

Kennedy, 390 So.2d 149 (Fla. 1st DCA 1980); § 443.151(4)(c), Fla. Stat. (1991). The referee found that

Unemployment Appeals Com'n v. Comer

504 So. 2d 760

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Apr 2, 1987 | Docket: 1511214

Cited 3 times | Published

recovery of overpayments should be waived under section 443.151(6)(c), Florida Statutes (1983). The Unemployment

Sheppard v. STATE, DEPT. OF LABOR AND EMPLOYMENT SEC.

442 So. 2d 1114

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 28, 1983 | Docket: 468984

Cited 3 times | Published

include defenses contained in (c), holding: Section 443.151(6)(c), supra, provides that in the case of

Garcia v. DEPT. OF LABOR & EMPLOYMENT SEC.

426 So. 2d 1171

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 8, 1983 | Docket: 2560124

Cited 3 times | Published

would be against equity and good conscience. § 443.151(6)(c), Fla. Stat. (1981); Sagaert v. State, Department

Waldron v. City of Arcadia

409 So. 2d 1138

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 10, 1982 | Docket: 526014

Cited 3 times | Published

procedure for filing an appeal is found in section 443.151(4)(b)3, Florida Statutes (1980), which provides:

Simmons v. FLORIDA UNEMPLOYMENT APPEALS COMMISSION

44 So. 3d 222, 2010 Fla. App. LEXIS 14015, 2010 WL 3655698

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 22, 2010 | Docket: 2543020

Cited 2 times | Published

that the appeal was untimely and affirm. See § 443.151(4)(b)5, Fla. Stat. (2010) (providing twenty days

Lynch v. UNEMPLOYMENT APPEALS COM'N

988 So. 2d 25, 2008 WL 2550746

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 27, 2008 | Docket: 1384753

Cited 2 times | Published

application for unemployment benefits. In light of section 443.151(4)(e), Florida Statutes (2007), this court

Dumorange v. Florida Unemployment Appeals

947 So. 2d 472, 2006 Fla. App. LEXIS 18314, 2006 WL 3079014

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 1, 2006 | Docket: 64848689

Cited 2 times | Published

does not contain a good cause exception. See § 443.151(4)(e), Fla. Stat. (2006). In fact, Rule 60BB-7

Molina v. Home Depot USA Inc.

941 So. 2d 460, 2006 Fla. App. LEXIS 17629, 2006 WL 3020390

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 25, 2006 | Docket: 64847736

Cited 2 times | Published

mailing of the notice of the referee’s decision. § 443.151(4)(b)5, Fla. Stat. (2005). If an application for

Lawson v. Elizabethtown Gas Company

913 So. 2d 738, 2005 WL 2863013

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 2, 2005 | Docket: 567056

Cited 2 times | Published

Unemployment Appeals Commission's orders. See § 443.151(3)(a), Fla. Stat. (2004)(providing that a denial

Lopez v. American Airlines

876 So. 2d 1217, 2004 WL 1252774

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 9, 2004 | Docket: 73200

Cited 2 times | Published

that the referee's decision was mailed to him. § 443.151(4)(b)3, Fla. Stat. (2003). See Venero v. Winn

Kelly v. Unemployment Appeals Com'n

823 So. 2d 275, 2002 Fla. App. LEXIS 11292, 27 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. D 1826

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 9, 2002 | Docket: 458431

Cited 2 times | Published

accordance with the procedure established in section 443.151(4), Florida Statutes (2001). The Division will

Fryer v. FLORIDA UNEMPLOYMENT APPEALS COM'N

691 So. 2d 27, 1997 WL 148786

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 2, 1997 | Docket: 438495

Cited 2 times | Published

reason for filing the notice late. Pursuant to section 443.151(3)(a), Florida Statutes (1993), and Florida

Egner v. UNEMPLOYMENT APPEALS COM'N

633 So. 2d 1157, 1994 WL 86446

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 21, 1994 | Docket: 1296509

Cited 2 times | Published

021(6) and 35.03, Fla. Stat. (1993). Further, section 443.151(4)(e) provides that final orders of the Unemployment

Comer v. STATE, UNEMPLOYMENT APPEALS COM'N

481 So. 2d 67, 11 Fla. L. Weekly 60, 1985 Fla. App. LEXIS 17378

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 24, 1985 | Docket: 1366942

Cited 2 times | Published

Commission, 418 So.2d 1228 (Fla. 3d DCA 1982); see § 443.151(6)(b)-(d), Fla. Stat. (1983). We also certify

Colson v. Florida Unemployment Appeals Commission

76 So. 3d 1042, 2011 Fla. App. LEXIS 19995, 2011 WL 6224593

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 15, 2011 | Docket: 2360606

Cited 1 times | Published

The Commission correctly points out that section 443.151(3)(c), Florida Statutes, clearly provides for

Ellis v. Unemployment Appeals Commission

73 So. 3d 887, 2011 Fla. App. LEXIS 18104, 2011 WL 5554822

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 16, 2011 | Docket: 2357404

Cited 1 times | Published

4th DCA 2004) (internal citation omitted). Section 443.151(3)(b), Florida Statutes, provides that monetary

Hood v. Florida Unemployment Appeals Commission

72 So. 3d 273, 2011 Fla. App. LEXIS 16266, 2011 WL 4905746

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 17, 2011 | Docket: 60303237

Cited 1 times | Published

conversations with the Commission’s adjuster. Section 443.151(3)(c), Florida Statutes, provides for the 20-day

Bertot v. Florida Unemployment Appeals Commission

68 So. 3d 1012, 2011 WL 3305375

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 28, 2011 | Docket: 2359258

Cited 1 times | Published

issuance of a redetermination, pursuant to section 443.151(3)(e)(3), Florida Statutes. We hold that it

MacHado v. Florida Unemployment Appeals Commission

48 So. 3d 1004, 2010 Fla. App. LEXIS 18361, 2010 WL 4909217

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 3, 2010 | Docket: 2399706

Cited 1 times | Published

reverse and remand for an evidentiary hearing. Section 443.151(4)(b)5., Florida Statutes (2010), provides

Markham v. Florida Unemployment Appeals Commission

47 So. 3d 958, 2010 Fla. App. LEXIS 17679, 2010 WL 4628539

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 17, 2010 | Docket: 2401452

Cited 1 times | Published

20-day statutory time limit had expired. See § 443.151(3)(a), Fla. Stat. (2009). Accordingly, the Appeals

McGlond v. Florida Unemployment Appeals Commission

43 So. 3d 141, 2010 Fla. App. LEXIS 12403, 2010 WL 3324305

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 25, 2010 | Docket: 60295412

Cited 1 times | Published

807 So.2d 195 (Fla. 3d DCA 2002); Fla. Stat. § 443.151(4)(b)(5) (2009).

Green v. UNEMPLOYMENT APPEALS COMMISSION

34 So. 3d 145

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 21, 2010 | Docket: 2575161

Cited 1 times | Published

SCHWARTZ, Senior Judge. PER CURIAM. Affirmed. See § 443.151(3)(a), Fla. Stat. (2009); Quintana v. Florida

Valera v. FLORIDA UNEMPLOYMENT APPEALS COMMISSION

25 So. 3d 1250, 2010 Fla. App. LEXIS 269, 2010 WL 173616

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 20, 2010 | Docket: 52044

Cited 1 times | Published

days from the mailing of the determination. See § 443.151(3)(a), Fla. Stat. (2009); Fla Admin. Code Rule

De La Torre v. Siguanea, LLC.

10 So. 3d 1164, 2009 Fla. App. LEXIS 6225, 2009 WL 1457122

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 27, 2009 | Docket: 1266046

Cited 1 times | Published

untimeliness and affirm the Commission's order. See § 443.151(3)(a), Fla. Stat. (2008) (providing that a denial

Presnell v. Unemployment Appeals Commission

1 So. 3d 1113, 2009 Fla. App. LEXIS 254, 2009 WL 102218

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 16, 2009 | Docket: 1653459

Cited 1 times | Published

courts that have considered the meaning of section 443.151(4)(e), Florida Statutes, seem to agree that

Aragon v. BANANA REPUBLIC, LLC

979 So. 2d 335, 2008 WL 724022

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 19, 2008 | Docket: 2586499

Cited 1 times | Published

ROTHENBERG, JJ. *336 PER CURIAM. Affirmed. See § 443.151(3)(a), Fla. Stat. (2007); Fla. Admin. Code R.

Ambrister v. Florida Unemp. Appeals Com'n

968 So. 2d 623, 2007 WL 3010048

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 17, 2007 | Docket: 1453055

Cited 1 times | Published

been presented to us, and we therefore affirm. § 443.151(4)(b)4, Fla. Stat. (2006); Espinosa *624 v. Cableoptics

Exposito v. South Florida Hotels, Inc.

994 So. 2d 1117, 2007 WL 1484502

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 23, 2007 | Docket: 2543582

Cited 1 times | Published

jurisdiction to consider the merits of Exposito's claim. § 443.151(3)(a), Fla. Stat. (2006) (providing that a denial

Augustin v. STATE UNEMPLOYMENT APPEALS COMMISSION

906 So. 2d 1238, 2005 WL 1750743

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 27, 2005 | Docket: 1775691

Cited 1 times | Published

governing hearings before appeals referees. See § 443.151(4)(d), Fla. Stat. (2002). Pursuant to that power

Nelson v. Unemployment Appeals Commission

880 So. 2d 1232, 2004 Fla. App. LEXIS 12611, 2004 WL 1905900

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 27, 2004 | Docket: 64832319

Cited 1 times | Published

as it did after the appeals period had run. Section 443.151(4)(b)(4), Florida Statutes (2003), requires

ACCORD HUMAN RESOURCES OF FL., III, INC. v. Unemployment Appeals Com'n

868 So. 2d 595, 2004 Fla. App. LEXIS 2940, 2004 WL 399818

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 5, 2004 | Docket: 1510624

Cited 1 times | Published

sent notice to Accord. Additionally, while section 443.151(4)(b)(1)-(3), Florida Statutes, requires appeals

Mendelsohn v. FL. UNEMPLOYMENT APPEALS COM'N

851 So. 2d 208, 2003 WL 21466932

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 26, 2003 | Docket: 1691472

Cited 1 times | Published

request was thus an untimely filing under section 443.151(4)(b)3, Florida Statutes, and the Commission

Rochussen v. UNEMPLOYMENT APPEALS COM'N

795 So. 2d 1075, 2001 WL 1104551

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 21, 2001 | Docket: 1673243

Cited 1 times | Published

disposition of the claimant's appeal pursuant to Section 443.151(4)(c), Florida Statutes, of a referee's decision

Reeves v. FLORIDA UNEMPLOYMENT APPEALS COM'N

782 So. 2d 525, 2001 WL 360153

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 12, 2001 | Docket: 456448

Cited 1 times | Published

redetermination, and the Commission affirmed. Section 443.151(3)(a), Florida Statutes, provides that an employer

Moreno v. STATE, UNEMPLOYMENT APPEALS

676 So. 2d 469, 1996 WL 295049

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 5, 1996 | Docket: 65196

Cited 1 times | Published

to require him to make repayment. Although section 443.151(6)(c), Florida Statutes *470 (1995) provides

Poppe v. Eclectic Business MacHines

661 So. 2d 65, 1995 WL 358266

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 16, 1995 | Docket: 532498

Cited 1 times | Published

substantial evidence. Verner, 474 So.2d 909; § 443.151(4)(c), Fla. Stat. (1993). In this case, the referee's

Koppelman v. UNEMPLOYMENT APP. COMM.

626 So. 2d 322, 1993 WL 462763

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 12, 1993 | Docket: 1685077

Cited 1 times | Published

was not filed within 20 days as required by section 443.151(4)(b)3, Florida Statutes (1991), and Rule 38E-3

Sun States Services v. Unemp. App. Com'n

629 So. 2d 858, 1993 WL 323149

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 27, 1993 | Docket: 1264559

Cited 1 times | Published

either by the Division or the appeals referee. Section 443.151, Fla. Stat. (1991). It seems wasteful, both

Oliver v. UNEMPLOYMENT APPEALS COM'N

616 So. 2d 1088, 1993 WL 100188

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 7, 1993 | Docket: 1726693

Cited 1 times | Published

be dismissed." (Emphasis added.) Similarly, section 443.151(3)(a), Florida Statutes (1991), provides in

Carrigan v. UNEMPLOYMENT APPEALS COM'N

615 So. 2d 216, 1993 WL 55963

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 5, 1993 | Docket: 1658593

Cited 1 times | Published

to the untimely finding of the appeal. [2] Section 443.151(3)(d) provides: (a) Notice of determination

Robinson v. Morrison, Inc.

501 So. 2d 1323

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 25, 1987 | Docket: 538534

Cited 1 times | Published

appellant. Appellee basically tells us that section 443.151(4)(b)3, Florida Statutes, allows only twenty

Renelus v. FLA. UNEMP. APPEALS COMM.

484 So. 2d 629, 11 Fla. L. Weekly 556

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 4, 1986 | Docket: 2587223

Cited 1 times | Published

Appeals Commission, affirming a finding that section 443.151(6) of the Florida Statutes (1983) does not

NORMAN v. REEMPLOYMENT ASSISTANCE APPEALS COMMISSION

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 21, 2024 | Docket: 68135356

Published

his appeal to the Commission has merit. But section 443.151(4)(b)6, Florida Statutes (2022), required Mr

Katherine Mirella Area Alvarez v. Reemployment Assistance Appeals Commission

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 29, 2024 | Docket: 68799653

Published

dismissed the appeal as untimely.”); see also § 443.151(4)(b)(3), Fla. Stat. (2023) (“If an appeal appears

Cyr v. Reemployment Assistance Appeals Commission

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 14, 2024 | Docket: 68251067

Published

Appellant’s administrative appeal as untimely. See § 443.151(4)(b)1., Fla. Stat. (2022) (allowing twenty days

Juan M. Lopez Alonso v. Reemployment Assistance Appeals Commission

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 22, 2023 | Docket: 68029157

Published

GORDO, JJ. PER CURIAM. Affirmed. See § 443.151(4)(b)1, Fla. Stat. (2021) (“The claimant or any

MAGALY H. BENITEZ v. REEMPLOYMENT ASSISTANCE APPEALS COMMISSION

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 4, 2023 | Docket: 66698507

Published

BOKOR, JJ. PER CURIAM. Affirmed. See § 443.151(3)(c), Fla. Stat. (2022) (providing that the

NICOLE HENRY v. REEMPLOYMENT ASSISTANCE APPEALS COMMISSION

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 3, 2022 | Docket: 64865302

Published

days late. The Commission then, pursuant to section 443.151(4)(b)3. of the Florida Statutes, 1 issued

Linden v. Reemployment

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 1, 2018 | Docket: 6259628

Published

her appeal with the RAAC. Unfortunately, section 443.151(4)(b)1., Florida Statutes (2016), which governs

WHS Trucking LLC v. Reemployment Assistance Appeals Commission

183 So. 3d 460

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 14, 2016 | Docket: 3028635

Published

appears that the redetermination statute, section 443.151(3)(e) of the Florida Statutes (2013), allows

Soler v. Reemployment Assistance Appeals Commission

143 So. 3d 1152, 2014 WL 3844150, 2014 Fla. App. LEXIS 12036

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 6, 2014 | Docket: 60242270

Published

PER CURIAM. Affirmed. See § 443.151(4)(b)(6), Fla. Stat. (2013) (“The referee’s decision is final unless

Soler v. Reemployment Assistance Appeals Commission

143 So. 3d 1154, 2014 WL 3844152, 2014 Fla. App. LEXIS 12035

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 6, 2014 | Docket: 60242271

Published

PER CURIAM. Affirmed. See § 443.151(4)(b)(6), Fla. Stat. (2013) (“The referee’s decision is final unless

Dowden v. Reemployment Assistance Appeals Commission

132 So. 3d 1198, 2014 WL 562934, 2014 Fla. App. LEXIS 2032

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 14, 2014 | Docket: 60238339

Published

without good cause chargeable to her employer. See § 443.151(4)(a), (c), (e), Fla. Stat. *1200(2012). We conclude

Gregg v. Reemployment Assistance Appeals Commission

135 So. 3d 388, 2014 WL 335999, 2014 Fla. App. LEXIS 1143

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 31, 2014 | Docket: 60239610

Published

the twenty-day appeal deadline set forth in section 443.151(4)(b), Florida Statutes (2012). Despite the

Perez v. Reemployment Assistance Appeals Commission

116 So. 3d 567, 2013 WL 3015046, 2013 Fla. App. LEXIS 9629

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 19, 2013 | Docket: 60232390

Published

appeals referee was untimely filed is affirmed. See § 443.151(3)(c) Fla. Stat. (2013); Quintana v. Fla. Unemployment

Mays v. Reemployment Assistance Appeals Commission

107 So. 3d 559, 2013 WL 692970, 2013 Fla. App. LEXIS 3143

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 27, 2013 | Docket: 60228762

Published

fact in an unemployment compensation case. See § 443.151(4)(b)5.c., Fla. Stat. (2012). We elect to treat

Guillen v. Reemployment Assistance Appeals Commission

103 So. 3d 207, 2012 Fla. App. LEXIS 20052, 2012 WL 5895081

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 21, 2012 | Docket: 60227004

Published

This argument is contradicted by the record. Section 443.151(3) of the Florida Statutes governs eligibility

Moran v. Reemployment Assistance Appeals Commission

114 So. 3d 214, 2012 WL 5043210, 2012 Fla. App. LEXIS 18260

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 19, 2012 | Docket: 60231805

Published

provide separation information pursuant to section 443.151(3)(a), Florida Statutes (2011). Moran misreads

Frate v. Reemployment Assistance Appeals Commission

134 So. 3d 1012, 2012 WL 3870850, 2012 Fla. App. LEXIS 14969

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 7, 2012 | Docket: 60238992

Published

PER CURIAM. Section 443.151(4), Florida Statutes (2010), allows only adversely affected parties to appeal

Walter v. Florida Unemployment Appeals Commission

86 So. 3d 1285, 2012 WL 1631780, 2012 Fla. App. LEXIS 7356

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 10, 2012 | Docket: 60307629

Published

was not entitled to compensation benefits. See § 443.151(4)(b)2., Fla. Stat. (providing that an appeals

Crespo v. Unemployment Appeals Commission

84 So. 3d 1117, 2012 WL 933054

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 21, 2012 | Docket: 60306593

Published

a request for redetermination pursuant to section 443.151(3)(e)l., Florida Statutes. As the employer

Peterson v. Florida Unemployment Appeals Commission

77 So. 3d 905, 2012 Fla. App. LEXIS 809, 2012 WL 178374

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 24, 2012 | Docket: 2353756

Published

Comm'n, 904 So.2d 477, 479 (Fla. 1st DCA 2005). Section 443.151(3)(a), Florida Statutes (2009), provides that

Rostran v. Florida Unemployment Appeals Commission

83 So. 3d 844, 2011 Fla. App. LEXIS 19892, 2011 WL 6183490

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 14, 2011 | Docket: 60306507

Published

followed. Although the majority is correct that section 443.151(4), Florida Statutes (2009), has no judicially-recognized

Luis v. Florida Unemployment Appeals Commission

77 So. 3d 712, 2011 Fla. App. LEXIS 18115, 2011 WL 5554838

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 16, 2011 | Docket: 60304763

Published

obligated to affirm the dismissal of her appeal. Section 443.151(3), Florida Statutes (2010); de la Torre v

Milner v. Florida Unemployment Appeals Commission

82 So. 3d 1026, 2011 WL 3837294, 2011 Fla. App. LEXIS 13769

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 31, 2011 | Docket: 2416408

Published

Comm'n, 881 So.2d 89, 91 (Fla. 1st DCA 2004) ("Section 443.151(4)(b), governing appeals from UAC determinations

Gonzalez v. Florida Unemployment Appeals Commission

80 So. 3d 335, 2011 Fla. App. LEXIS 10174, 2010 WL 4103359

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 29, 2011 | Docket: 2415691

Published

that Ms. Gonzalez was entitled to benefits. See § 443.151(4)(b)l, Fla. Stat. (2010). According to the employer

Lopez v. A Aaron Super Rooter, Inc.

54 So. 3d 575, 2011 Fla. App. LEXIS 1534, 2011 WL 613694

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 9, 2011 | Docket: 60298331

Published

were “overpayments” he was required to repay. Section 443.151(3)(e)l., Florida Statutes (2009), expressly

Flores v. FLORIDA UNEMPLOYMENT APPEALS COMMISSION

48 So. 3d 970, 2010 Fla. App. LEXIS 18316, 2010 WL 4861736

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 1, 2010 | Docket: 2587522

Published

20-day statutory time limit had expired. See § 443.151(3)(a), Fla. Stat. (2009). Accordingly, the Appeals

Arensen v. Florida Unemployment Appeals Commission

48 So. 3d 936, 2010 Fla. App. LEXIS 18998, 2010 WL 4829962

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 30, 2010 | Docket: 60296657

Published

to file an appeal of that determination. See § 443.151(3)(c) and (4)(b), Fla. Stat.; rule 60BB-5.007

Ponce v. Florida Unemployment Appeals Commission

47 So. 3d 929, 2010 Fla. App. LEXIS 17173, 2010 WL 4483420

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 10, 2010 | Docket: 2400635

Published

of benefits claimed by a former employee, section 443.151(3)(c)1, Florida Statutes (2009), states that

Ponce v. Florida Unemployment Appeals Commission

47 So. 3d 929, 2010 Fla. App. LEXIS 17173, 2010 WL 4483420

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 10, 2010 | Docket: 2400635

Published

of benefits claimed by a former employee, section 443.151(3)(c)1, Florida Statutes (2009), states that

Guardian Ad Litem Program v. O.R.

45 So. 3d 974, 2010 Fla. App. LEXIS 15560, 2010 WL 3984709

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 13, 2010 | Docket: 1929147

Published

possible in the parent's principal language."); § 443.151(8)(a), Fla. Stat. (2007) ("The Agency for Workforce

Evans v. Unemployment Appeals Commission

42 So. 3d 931, 2010 Fla. App. LEXIS 12534, 2010 WL 3359414

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 27, 2010 | Docket: 1647254

Published

review of the evidentiary hearing pursuant to section 443.151(4)(c), Florida Statutes (2008), and *932 vacated

Green v. Unemployment Appeals Commission

34 So. 3d 145, 2010 Fla. App. LEXIS 5277

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 21, 2010 | Docket: 60289991

Published

PER CURIAM. Affirmed. See § 443.151(3)(a), Fla. Stat. (2009); Quintana v. Florida Unemployment Appeals

Keables v. Florida Unemployment Appeals Commission

31 So. 3d 841, 2010 Fla. App. LEXIS 2083, 2010 WL 624170

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 24, 2010 | Docket: 2565356

Published

521 So.2d 220 (Fla. 2d DCA 1988). Further, section 443.151(6)(b), Florida Statutes (2008), requires Keables

Mejia v. Cottonimages. Com, Inc.

27 So. 3d 688, 2009 Fla. App. LEXIS 20390, 2009 WL 5125110

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 30, 2009 | Docket: 1018724

Published

SCHWARTZ, Senior Judge. WELLS, Judge. Affirmed. See § 443.151(3), Fla. Stat. (2009) (providing that an appeal

Blaisdell v. State, Unemployment Appeals Commission

15 So. 3d 806, 2009 Fla. App. LEXIS 10012, 2009 WL 2168865

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 22, 2009 | Docket: 1660871

Published

learning of the determination. Florida Statute section 443.151(4)(b)1 provides: The claimant or any other

Williams v. Florida Unemployment Appeals Commission

5 So. 3d 786, 2009 Fla. App. LEXIS 2502, 2009 WL 763614

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 25, 2009 | Docket: 60297212

Published

ruling of the appeals referee as untimely. See § 443.151(4)(b), Fla. Stat. (2007); Fla. Admin. Code R.

Garcia v. UNEMPLOYMENT APPEALS COM'N

979 So. 2d 1174, 2008 Fla. App. LEXIS 5870, 2008 WL 1805829

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 23, 2008 | Docket: 1713984

Published

Appeals failed to demonstrate compliance with section 443.151(8)(a) of the Florida Statutes (2007), "Bilingual

Jodnauth v. Florida Unemployment Appeals Commission

964 So. 2d 803, 2007 Fla. App. LEXIS 14579, 2007 WL 2710791

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 19, 2007 | Docket: 64852435

Published

without jurisdiction to consider the appeal. See § 443.151(3)(a), Fla. Stat. (2006). This Court is similarly

State, Agency for Workforce Innovation v. Ritchie

951 So. 2d 111, 2007 Fla. App. LEXIS 3834, 2007 WL 776487

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 16, 2007 | Docket: 64849706

Published

affirm, modify, or reverse the determination. § 443.151, Fla. Stat. (2006).

Hernandez v. Security Windows & Doors, Inc.

946 So. 2d 81, 2006 Fla. App. LEXIS 21596, 2006 WL 3780852

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 27, 2006 | Docket: 64848514

Published

mistake because of her poor English. Pursuant to section 443.151(4)(b)5, Florida Statutes (2005), a claimant

Brandt v. State of Florida Unemployment Appeals Commission & UPS

932 So. 2d 497, 2006 Fla. App. LEXIS 9654, 2006 WL 1627103

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 14, 2006 | Docket: 64845579

Published

PER CURIAM. Affirmed. See § 443.151 (3)(a), Fla. Stat. (2005). WARNER, KLEIN and GROSS, JJ., concur

King v. Florida Unemployment Appeals Commission

923 So. 2d 557, 2006 Fla. App. LEXIS 3744, 2006 WL 658665

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 17, 2006 | Docket: 64842984

Published

and in accordance with the requirements of section 443.151(6)(b), Florida Statutes (2004). Finding no

Grover v. Brumell Investigations, Inc.

915 So. 2d 750, 2005 Fla. App. LEXIS 19294, 2005 WL 3334576

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 9, 2005 | Docket: 64841079

Published

constituted “new information” to the Division under section 443.151(3)(c)l. The record clearly demonstrates that

Consumer Credit Services, Inc. v. State Agency for Workforce Innovation Unemployment Compensation Office of Appeals

909 So. 2d 947, 2005 Fla. App. LEXIS 13274, 2005 WL 2006943

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 23, 2005 | Docket: 64840224

Published

affirm, modify, or reverse the determination.” § 443.151(4)(b)2., Fla. Stat. (2003). Here, the recommendation

Ago

Florida Attorney General Reports | Filed: Jul 12, 2005 | Docket: 3257244

Published

matter is opened to the public at a hearing.9 Section 443.151, Florida Statutes, prescribes the procedure

Calderon v. Publix Super Markets, Inc.

906 So. 2d 1138, 2005 Fla. App. LEXIS 9217, 2005 WL 1398502

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 15, 2005 | Docket: 64839600

Published

the referee’s decision was mailed to him. See § 443.151(4)(b), Fla. Stat. (2004); Malary v. Brinker Int’l

Cancio v. Target Stores

897 So. 2d 550, 2005 Fla. App. LEXIS 4370, 2005 WL 714056

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 30, 2005 | Docket: 64837203

Published

to him. § 443.151(4)(b), Fla. Stat. (2003); Guerrero, 855 So.2d at 268 (“Under section 443.151(4)(b)3

Dahlquist v. Unemployment Appeals Commission

898 So. 2d 186, 2005 Fla. App. LEXIS 3227, 2005 WL 562670

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 11, 2005 | Docket: 64837331

Published

referee within the time period allowed by section 443.151(4)(b)4, Florida Statutes (2004). We have fully

Gardner v. K Mart Corp.

895 So. 2d 1239, 2005 Fla. App. LEXIS 2443, 2005 WL 475501

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 2, 2005 | Docket: 64836565

Published

dismissing his appeal as untimely. We affirm. Section 443.151(4)(b)(4), Florida Statutes (2004), provides:

Maldonado v. Florida Unemployment Appeals Commission

895 So. 2d 1198, 2005 Fla. App. LEXIS 2017, 2005 WL 415998

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 23, 2005 | Docket: 64836544

Published

properly dismissed as untimely in accordance with section 443.151(3)(a), Florida Statutes (1993). We are thus

Willis v. Florida Unemployment Appeals Commission

890 So. 2d 535, 2005 Fla. App. LEXIS 54, 2005 WL 127298

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 7, 2005 | Docket: 64835314

Published

Workforce Innovation (the Agency). We agree. Section 443.151(3)(e)l., Florida ■ Statutes (2003), does not

Atinsky v. Unemployment Appeals Commission

889 So. 2d 208, 2004 Fla. App. LEXIS 19120, 2004 WL 2898117

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 15, 2004 | Docket: 64835001

Published

appeal the Amended Redetermination. Under section 443.151(3)(a), Florida Statutes (2001), determinations

Price v. Unemployment Appeals Commission

889 So. 2d 861, 2004 Fla. App. LEXIS 17893, 2004 WL 2730781

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 24, 2004 | Docket: 64835141

Published

C.J., KLEIN and STEVENSON, JJ„ concur. . Section 443.151 (4) (b), Florida Statutes (2003), requires

Dubery v. Miccosukee Tribe of Indians

889 So. 2d 122, 2004 Fla. App. LEXIS 17907, 2004 WL 2727752

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 24, 2004 | Docket: 64834980

Published

Unemployment Appeals Commission was untimely, see § 443.151(4)(b)4, Fla. Stat. (2004), we affirm the dismissal

Clinton v. Unemployment Appeals Commission

886 So. 2d 1024, 2004 Fla. App. LEXIS 16959, 2004 WL 2755623

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 2, 2004 | Docket: 64834179

Published

PER CURIAM. AFFIRMED. See § 443.151(6)(b), Fla. Stat. (2003). SHARP, W., MONACO and TORPY, JJ., concur

Albrecht v. Unemployment Appeals Commission

869 So. 2d 758, 2004 Fla. App. LEXIS 4650, 2004 WL 741587

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 8, 2004 | Docket: 64829203

Published

the statute prescribing the time limitations. § 443.151(3)(a), Fla. Stat. (2003). The disposition of this

Griffin v. Unemployment Appeals Commission

868 So. 2d 1262, 2004 Fla. App. LEXIS 3743, 2004 WL 574487

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 24, 2004 | Docket: 64829080

Published

dismissed as untimely on the authority of section 443.151(4)(b)3, Florida Statutes. For the reasons outlined

Leichering v. Unemployment Appeals Commission

854 So. 2d 850, 2003 Fla. App. LEXIS 14542, 2003 WL 22213368

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 26, 2003 | Docket: 64825190

Published

urges that the referee was legally bound under section 443.151(3)(a), Florida Statutes (2000) to dismiss appellant’s

Garcia v. Florida Unemployment Appeals Commission

847 So. 2d 533, 2003 Fla. App. LEXIS 5403, 2003 WL 1877798

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 16, 2003 | Docket: 64823341

Published

affirmed the decision of the appeals referee. See § 443.151, Fla. Stat. (6)(b) (2001). Affirmed.

Collington v. Unemployment Appeals Commission

841 So. 2d 611, 2003 Fla. App. LEXIS 4437, 2003 WL 1721170

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 2, 2003 | Docket: 64821776

Published

untimeliness of Collington’s appeal. Fla. Stat. § 443.151(4)(b)(2001); see Espinosa v. Cableoptics, Inc

Gutierrez v. Florida Unemployment Compensation

837 So. 2d 609, 2003 Fla. App. LEXIS 1813, 2003 WL 354892

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 19, 2003 | Docket: 64820758

Published

decision was not timely mailed, we affirm. See § 443.151(4)(b)3, Fla. Stat. (2001); Espinosa v. Cableoptics

Castro v. Unemployment Appeals Commission

835 So. 2d 286, 2002 Fla. App. LEXIS 17788, 2002 WL 31696791

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 4, 2002 | Docket: 64820054

Published

dismissal of appeal as untimely and noting that section 443.151(4)(b)3, Florida Statutes (1995), does not provide

Venero v. Winn Dixie Stores, Inc.

826 So. 2d 495, 2002 Fla. App. LEXIS 13927, 2002 WL 31114743

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 25, 2002 | Docket: 64817662

Published

notice of denial of benefits as prescribed by section 443.151(3)(a), Florida Statutes (2001) and Florida

Anderson v. Unemployment Appeals Commission

822 So. 2d 563, 2002 Fla. App. LEXIS 10901

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 2, 2002 | Docket: 64816652

Published

herself of her right to appeal provided by section 443.151(4), Florida Statutes (2000). The Referee, appointed

Scanlan v. Selective HR Solutions, IV Inc.

821 So. 2d 1188, 2002 Fla. App. LEXIS 10323, 2002 WL 1630826

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 24, 2002 | Docket: 64816550

Published

it was filed after the statutory deadline. See § 443.151(4)(b)3., Fla. Stat. (2001). Because no error of

Helms v. Fleetwood Homes of Florida, Inc.

802 So. 2d 380, 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 15718, 2001 WL 1358718

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 7, 2001 | Docket: 64810955

Published

So.2d 413 (Fla. 2d DCA 2000) (holding that section 443.151(4)(b), Florida Statutes (1995), does not contain

Neely v. Unemployment Appeals Commission

796 So. 2d 561, 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 10627, 2001 WL 845512

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 27, 2001 | Docket: 64809210

Published

entertain Mr. Neely’s appeal, we must affirm. Section 443.151(4)(b)(3), Florida Statutes (1999), requires

Perenzuela v. Florida Unemployment Appeals Commission

779 So. 2d 670, 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 3496, 2001 WL 273581

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 21, 2001 | Docket: 64804273

Published

determination on the merits of her claim. See § 443.151(3)(a), Fla. Stat. (1999).

Svenson v. Florida Unemployment Appeals Commission

778 So. 2d 537, 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 2438, 2001 WL 218982

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 7, 2001 | Docket: 64803819

Published

from that denial was not timely. See Fla. Stat. § 443.151(S)(a) (1999) (“such determination shall be final

Johnson v. Florida Unemployment Appeals Commission

773 So. 2d 1256, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 16651, 2000 WL 1853636

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 20, 2000 | Docket: 64802591

Published

PER CURIAM. Affirmed. See § 443.151(3)(a), Fla.Stat. (2000); Florida Administrative Code Rule 38E-5

Pagliaro v. Penske Auto Centers, Inc.

773 So. 2d 1174, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 15016, 2000 WL 1716240

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 17, 2000 | Docket: 64802539

Published

record to support the dismissal, we affirm. Section 443.151(4)(b)(3), Florida Statutes (1999), requires

Fort v. Florida Unemployment Appeals Commission

773 So. 2d 1170, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 14882, 2000 WL 1700195

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 15, 2000 | Docket: 64802534

Published

the UAC’s decision to dismiss the appeal. Section 443.151(4)(b)3., Florida Statutes (1997), requires

Brooks v. Unemployment Appeals Commission

760 So. 2d 1108, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 8260, 25 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. D 1632

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 5, 2000 | Docket: 64798162

Published

him to file a request for rede-termination. Section 443.151(3)(e)2 provides for an appeal to proceed simultaneously

Caldera v. Florida Unemployment Appeals Commission

758 So. 2d 736, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 5825, 2000 WL 628329

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 17, 2000 | Docket: 64797432

Published

properly dismissed the appeal as untimely. See § 443.151(4)(b)3, Fla. Stat. (1999) (referee’s decision

Gibbs v. Florida Unemployment Appeals Commission

758 So. 2d 1162, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 4570

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 19, 2000 | Docket: 64797550

Published

after the twenty-day deadline provided by section 443.151(4)(b)3, Fla. Stat. (1997)).

Altimeaux v. Ocean Construction Inc.

752 So. 2d 670, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 967, 25 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. D 334

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 4, 2000 | Docket: 64795571

Published

appeal to this court of the UAC’s dismissal. Section 443.151(4)(b)3., Florida Statutes (1997), requires

Gant v. Unemployment Appeals Commission

743 So. 2d 114, 1999 Fla. App. LEXIS 12338, 1999 WL 770631

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 17, 1999 | Docket: 64791659

Published

her hearing before the appeals referee. . See § 443.151(6), Fla. Stat. (1997).

Goldman v. Unemployment Appeals Commission

734 So. 2d 1203, 1999 Fla. App. LEXIS 9083, 1999 WL 454447

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 7, 1999 | Docket: 64788765

Published

Jenkins, 323 So.2d 597 (Fla. 1st DCA 1975); § 443.151(4)(b)3, Fla. Stat. (1997); Fla. Admin. Code R

Watt v. Ready Acquisition Corp.

730 So. 2d 848, 1999 Fla. App. LEXIS 5407, 1999 WL 247190

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 28, 1999 | Docket: 64787685

Published

. PER CURIAM. Affirmed. See § 443.151(3)(a), Fla. Stat. (1997).

Watt v. Ready Acquisition Corp.

730 So. 2d 848, 1999 Fla. App. LEXIS 5407, 1999 WL 247190

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 28, 1999 | Docket: 64787685

Published

. PER CURIAM. Affirmed. See § 443.151(3)(a), Fla. Stat. (1997).

Barnes v. State, Unemployment Appeals Commission

779 So. 2d 300, 1999 Fla. App. LEXIS 5097, 1999 WL 228153

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 21, 1999 | Docket: 64804092

Published

if not mailed, delivered) to the parties. See § 443.151(4)(b)3., Fla. Stat. (1997); Fla. Admin. Code R

Guido v. Vincam Human Resources, Inc.

729 So. 2d 968, 1999 Fla. App. LEXIS 2553, 1999 WL 123612

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 10, 1999 | Docket: 64787409

Published

was warranted under section 443.151(3)(c), Florida Statutes (1997). Section 443.151(3)(a), Florida Statutes

Horst v. UNEMPLOYMENT APPEALS COM'N

725 So. 2d 1266, 1999 WL 49392

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 5, 1999 | Docket: 1688891

Published

in other civil and administrative appeals. See § 443.151(4)(b), Fla. Stat. (1997), Mr. Horst did not attend

Cardona v. Sun Trust/Miami, N.A.

719 So. 2d 992, 1998 Fla. App. LEXIS 13669, 1998 WL 765039

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 28, 1998 | Docket: 64783837

Published

the twenty-day deadline provided by law. See § 443.151(4)(b)3, Fla. Stat. (1997). That being so, the

Apolinar v. FL. UNEMPLOYMENT APPEALS COM'N

710 So. 2d 199, 1998 WL 210830

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 1, 1998 | Docket: 1731422

Published

days after the referee entered the decision. See § 443.151(4)(b)3., Fla. Stat. (1995). Prior to summarily

Neville v. Florida Unemployment Appeals Commission

709 So. 2d 631, 1998 Fla. App. LEXIS 4261, 1998 WL 186813

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 22, 1998 | Docket: 64780246

Published

to which he was not entitled, pursuant to section 443.151(6), Florida Statutes (1995). See Teague v.

Brown v. ABC Distributing, Inc.

701 So. 2d 1200, 1997 Fla. App. LEXIS 12977, 1997 WL 716053

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 19, 1997 | Docket: 64777000

Published

PER CURIAM. Affirmed. § 443.151(3)(a), Fla. Stat. (1995).

Gonzalez v. Total Employment Corp.

701 So. 2d 124, 1997 Fla. App. LEXIS 12730, 1997 WL 699659

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 12, 1997 | Docket: 64776446

Published

PER CURIAM. Affirmed. See Section 443.151(6)(b), Florida Statutes, (1995); Delgado v. Concentrated Chemical

Cassidy v. Florida Unemployment Appeals Commission

695 So. 2d 849, 1997 Fla. App. LEXIS 6734, 1997 WL 330405

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 18, 1997 | Docket: 64774322

Published

days after the date of the notice of mailing. Section 443.151(4)(b)(3), Florida Statutes (1995), provides

Jodrey v. SCI Funeral Services of Florida, Inc.

689 So. 2d 453, 1997 Fla. App. LEXIS 2540, 22 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. D 762

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 19, 1997 | Docket: 64771693

Published

PER CURIAM. Affirmed. § 443.151(3)(a), Fla. Stat. (1996); Fla. Admin. Code R. 38E-5.007 (1996). See

Blaser v. Unemployment Appeals Commission

687 So. 2d 337, 1997 Fla. App. LEXIS 897, 1997 WL 43866

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 5, 1997 | Docket: 64770692

Published

entitled to the redetermination of benefits. See § 443.151(3)(c), Fla. Stat. (1995). We note that this redetermination

Calio v. Unemployment Appeals Commission

684 So. 2d 884, 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 13230, 1996 WL 728350

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 20, 1996 | Docket: 64769701

Published

assigned to an appeals referee for hearing. See § 443.151, Fla. Stat. (1993). At the hearing, conflicting

Henry v. Florida Unemployment Appeals Commission

682 So. 2d 631, 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 11398, 1996 WL 625928

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 30, 1996 | Docket: 64768746

Published

PER CURIAM. Affirmed. § 443.151(4)(b)3, Fla.Stat. (1995).

Hebert v. Unemployment Appeals Commission

677 So. 2d 1333, 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 8220, 1996 WL 434334

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 5, 1996 | Docket: 64766552

Published

decision, review by the Commission is initiated. Section 443.151(4)(b)3., Florida Statutes (1993). The appeals

Mora v. Florida Unemployment Appeals Commission

677 So. 2d 108, 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 7973, 1996 WL 426371

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 31, 1996 | Docket: 64766267

Published

discharged for misconduct in connection with work. Section 443.151(6)(b), Florida Statutes (1995), requires an

Bermudez v. Norrell Temporary Services, Inc.

667 So. 2d 501, 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 900, 1996 WL 47686

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 7, 1996 | Docket: 64762025

Published

untimely filed was correct and is affirmed. See § 443.151(4)(b)3, Fla.Stat. (1993); Leon v. Unemployment

Capers v. Vincam Human Resources, Inc.

661 So. 2d 958, 1995 Fla. App. LEXIS 11387, 1995 WL 623474

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 25, 1995 | Docket: 64759537

Published

PER CURIAM. Affirmed. See § 443.151(4)(b)3, Florida Statutes (1993).

Virgile v. Tri Star Protective Services

659 So. 2d 724, 1995 Fla. App. LEXIS 9522, 1995 WL 521139

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 6, 1995 | Docket: 64758482

Published

PER CURIAM. Affirmed. § 443.151(3)(a), Fla.Stat. (1993); Fla.Admin.Code Ann. r. 38E-5.007 (1993).

Munoz v. American Tire Express, Inc.

656 So. 2d 280, 1995 Fla. App. LEXIS 6700, 1995 WL 371264

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 21, 1995 | Docket: 64757173

Published

apparent injustice involved in that decision. See § 443.151(4)(b)(3), Fla.Stat. (1993); Fla.Admin.Code R.

Echevarria v. Burdines, Inc.

643 So. 2d 717, 1994 Fla. App. LEXIS 10003, 1994 WL 568503

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 19, 1994 | Docket: 64751442

Published

order of an appeals referee to the commission. § 443.151(4)(c), Fla.Stat. (1993). Affirmed.

Bresier v. Intercontinental Florida Operating Corp.

640 So. 2d 96, 1994 Fla. App. LEXIS 6918, 1994 WL 330092

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 12, 1994 | Docket: 64749888

Published

PER CURIAM. Affirmed. § 443.151(4)(b)3., Fla.Stat. (1993).

Cueto v. One Stop Fashion, Inc.

635 So. 2d 1087, 1994 Fla. App. LEXIS 4526, 1994 WL 176554

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 10, 1994 | Docket: 64747946

Published

notice of the appeals referee’s adverse decision. § 443.151(4)(b)3, Fla.Stat. (1993); see Leon v. Unemployment

Francis v. Ceco Chemical Manufacturing Co.

632 So. 2d 1153, 1994 Fla. App. LEXIS 2278, 1994 WL 81871

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 15, 1994 | Docket: 64746764

Published

unemployment compensation benefits was untimely. Section 443.151(3)(a), Florida Statutes (1993), provides that

Noegel v. Florida Unemployment Appeals Commission

627 So. 2d 1341, 1993 Fla. App. LEXIS 13233, 1993 WL 533795

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 22, 1993 | Docket: 64744703

Published

appellate review within the limits established by section 443.151(4)(b), Florida Statutes (1993). CAMPBELL, A

Dignan v. Unemployment Appeals Commission

629 So. 2d 231, 1993 Fla. App. LEXIS 12501, 1993 WL 504379

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 10, 1993 | Docket: 64744999

Published

Jenkins, 323 So.2d 597 (Fla. 1st DCA 1975); § 443.151(4)(b)3, Fla.Stat. (1991). COBB, W. SHARP and DIAMANTIS

Spiegel v. Frazel Histo-Path Lab, Inc.

624 So. 2d 790, 1993 Fla. App. LEXIS 9460, 1993 WL 370549

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 22, 1993 | Docket: 64743088

Published

not the common understanding of the term. Section 443.151(3)(c)1, Florida Statutes (1991) provides for

Menendez v. Cristina De Oliveira, P.A.

594 So. 2d 872, 1992 Fla. App. LEXIS 3296, 1992 WL 48798

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 17, 1992 | Docket: 64665581

Published

PER CURIAM. Affirmed. Section 443.151(4)(b)(3), Florida Statutes; Florida Administrative Code Rule 38E-3

Lamache v. Weathering Research Service Co.

593 So. 2d 1190, 1992 Fla. App. LEXIS 1377, 1992 WL 26466

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 18, 1992 | Docket: 64665390

Published

PER CURIAM. Affirmed. Section 443.151(3)(a) and (4)(b), Florida Statutes (1989).

Araque v. A T I Enterprises of Florida, Inc.

592 So. 2d 1270, 1992 Fla. App. LEXIS 1560, 1992 WL 21843

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 11, 1992 | Docket: 64664877

Published

PER CURIAM. Affirmed. § 443.151(4)(b)3, Fla.Stat. (1991); Leon v. Unemployment Appeals Commission, 476

Hatton v. Mister Donut

574 So. 2d 261, 1991 Fla. App. LEXIS 876, 1991 WL 13583

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 6, 1991 | Docket: 64656325

Published

authority to order a de novo hearing pursuant to section 443.151(4)(c), Florida Statutes (1989), it did not

Jack Eckerd Corp. v. Florida Unemployment Appeals Commission

525 So. 2d 468, 13 Fla. L. Weekly 1199, 1988 Fla. App. LEXIS 2018, 1988 WL 47495

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 17, 1988 | Docket: 64634890

Published

commission instead. We do not agree. While, under section 443.151(4)(e), Florida Statutes (1987), the commission

Hannon v. Department of Health & Rehabilitative Services

513 So. 2d 215, 1987 Fla. App. LEXIS 12192, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 2292

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 23, 1987 | Docket: 64629777

Published

unemployment benefits. We review the case pursuant to section 443.151(4)(e), Florida Statutes (1985), and set aside

Williams v. Florida Unemployment Appeals Commission

510 So. 2d 366, 1987 Fla. App. LEXIS 9576

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 28, 1987 | Docket: 64628578

Published

PER CURIAM. Affirmed. § 443.151(4)(a), (b), Fla.Stat. (1985); Fla.Admin.Code Rule 38E-5017.

MacVean v. Florida Unemployment Appeals Commission

503 So. 2d 411, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 624, 1987 Fla. App. LEXIS 11971

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 25, 1987 | Docket: 64625445

Published

ineligible. This court has previously interpreted section 443.151(6)(b), Florida Statutes, to require repayment

Cassady v. Florida Unemployment Appeals Commission

495 So. 2d 255, 11 Fla. L. Weekly 2077, 1986 Fla. App. LEXIS 9893

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 30, 1986 | Docket: 64622041

Published

Security, 418 So.2d 1228 (Fla. 3d DCA 1982). See § 443.151(6)(c), Fla.Stat. (1983). As in Rene-lus and Comer

Sheppard v. Florida Unemployment Appeals Commission

492 So. 2d 827, 11 Fla. L. Weekly 1801, 1986 Fla. App. LEXIS 9412

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 13, 1986 | Docket: 64621044

Published

the recovery by repayment, contemplated in section 443.151(6)(b), Florida Statutes (1985), of the unemployment

Tallahassee Junior Academy v. Unemployment Appeals Commission

461 So. 2d 968, 9 Fla. L. Weekly 2576, 1984 Fla. App. LEXIS 16686

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 11, 1984 | Docket: 64609152

Published

the kind of fair proceeding contemplated by section 443.151 and guaranteed by the Administrative Procedures

Tallahassee Junior Academy v. Unemployment Appeals Commission

461 So. 2d 968, 9 Fla. L. Weekly 2576, 1984 Fla. App. LEXIS 16686

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 11, 1984 | Docket: 64609152

Published

the kind of fair proceeding contemplated by section 443.151 and guaranteed by the Administrative Procedures

Vayvoski v. Unemployment Appeals Commission

443 So. 2d 145, 1983 Fla. App. LEXIS 24559

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 8, 1983 | Docket: 64601931

Published

a claimant for unemployment compensation. Section 443.151(4)(b)l, Florida Statutes (1982) provides: The

Clark v. Unemployment Appeals Commission

419 So. 2d 1135, 1982 Fla. App. LEXIS 28810

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 20, 1982 | Docket: 64592236

Published

PER CURIAM. Affirmed. See Section 443.151(4)(b)3, Florida Statutes (1981), and Florida State University

Noriega, Chopp & Schatz, P.A. v. Pena

417 So. 2d 312, 1982 Fla. App. LEXIS 20728

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 27, 1982 | Docket: 64591375

Published

Inc., 396 So.2d 778 (Fla. 1st DCA 1981); section 443.151(4)(c), Florida Statutes (1981). As to the notice

Port Carriers, Inc. v. Simmons

412 So. 2d 910, 1982 Fla. App. LEXIS 19589

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 1, 1982 | Docket: 64589335

Published

work as a condition for benefit eligibility. Section 443.-151(3)(a) requires notice of claim determination

Ago

Florida Attorney General Reports | Filed: Mar 4, 1981 | Docket: 3257175

Published

confidential by the language of s. 443.171(7), F.S. Section 443.151, F.S. (1980 Supp.), outlines the procedure