State v. Tompkins, 727 N.W.2d 423 (Neb. 2007). · Go Syfert
Search
State v. Tompkins, 727 N.W.2d 423 (Neb. 2007). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
19 citation events (19 in the last 25 years) across 2 distinct courts.
Top citers, strongest first. 1 distinct citer. How cited ↗
discussed Cited "see, e.g." State v. Nuss (2×)
Neb. · 2010 · signal: see also · confidence low
See, also, State v. Tompkins, 272 Neb. 547 , 723 N.W.2d 344 (2006), modified on denial of rehearing 272 Neb. 865 , 727 N.W.2d 423 (2007). [24] State v. Tompkins, supra note 23; State v. Johnson, 256 Neb. 133 , 589 N.W.2d 108 (1999), overruled on other grounds, State v. Davidson, 260 Neb. 417 , 618 N.W.2d 418 (2000).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
State of Nebraska, Appellee,
v.
Andrew Tompkins, Appellant
S-05-212.
Nebraska Supreme Court.
Jan 12, 2007.
727 N.W.2d 423
Brian J. Lockwood, Deputy Scotts Bluff County Public Defender, for appellant., Jon Bruning, Attorney General, and Kimberly A. Klein for appellee.
Connolly, Gerrard, Heavican, McCormack, Miller-Lerman, Stephan, Wright.
Cited by 50 opinions  |  Published
Per Curiam.

Case No. S-05-212 is before us on the motion for rehearing filed by the State of Nebraska, appellee, regarding our opinion reported at State v. Tompkins, ante p. 547, 723 N.W.2d 344 (2006). We overrule the motion, but for purposes of clarification, modify the opinion as follows:

That portion of the opinion designated “CONCLUSION,” id. at 554, 723 N.W.2d at 349, is withdrawn, and the following language is substituted in its place:

CONCLUSION
The Court of Appeals correctly concluded that the search warrant used to obtain certain evidence used against Tompkins was not based on an affidavit with sufficient indicia of probable cause as to Tompkins. However, because the State waived the Leon good faith exception by failing to raise it, the Court of Appeals erred in raising the issue on its own motion and in affirming the judgment of the district court on that basis. The evidence, including that erroneously received, was sufficient to sustain the conviction. Accordingly, Tompkins’ convictions should be reversed and he may be given a new trial at which the evidence obtained through the defective search warrant shall not be admissible. See Lockhart v. Nelson, 488 U.S. 33, 109 S. Ct. 285, 102 L. Ed. 2d 265 (1988). See, also, State v. Allen, 269 Neb. 69, 690 N.W.2d 582 (2005); State v. Sheets, 260 Neb. 325, 618 N.W.2d 117 (2000), overruled on other grounds, Crawford v. Washington, 541 U.S. 36, 124 S. Ct. 1354, 158 L. Ed. 2d 177 (2004). We therefore reverse the judgment of the Court of Appeals and remand the cause to that court with directions to reverse the judg- • ment of the district court and remand the cause to that court for a new trial consistent with this opinion.

Reversed and remanded with directions.

The remainder of the opinion shall remain unmodified.

Former opinion modified.

Motion for rehearing overruled.

Heavican, C.J., not participating.