Harper v. Poway Unified Sch. Dist., 549 U.S. 1262 (2007). · Go Syfert
Harper v. Poway Unified Sch. Dist., 549 U.S. 1262 (2007). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
67 citation events (67 in the last 25 years) across 21 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Waseem Daker v. Brian Owens (ca11, 2025-03-11)
Treatment trajectory · 2007 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
2007 2016 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 8 distinct citers. How cited ↗
discussed Cited as authority (verbatim quote) Waseem Daker v. Brian Owens
11th Cir. · 2025 · quote attribution · 1 verbatim quote · confidence high
we have previously dismissed interlocutory appeals from the denials of motions for temporary injunctions once final judgment has been entered.
examined Cited as authority (quoted) Sean Woodson v. Richard Colajezzi (2×)
3rd Cir. · 2014 · quote attribution · 2 verbatim quotes · confidence low
we have previously dismissed interlocutory appeals from the denials of motions for temporary injunctions once final judgment has been entered.
discussed Cited as authority (rule) Upside Foods Inc v. Commissioner, Florida Department of Agriculture an
11th Cir. · 2026 · confidence medium
Dist., 549 U.S. 1262, 1262 (2007), or if a key event cannot be unwound after the fact (for example, an election), see Ga. Muslim Voter Project v. Kemp, 918 F.3d 1262, 1279 (11th Cir. 2019) (Newsom, J., concurring).
discussed Cited as authority (rule) Waseem Daker v. Timothy Ward
11th Cir. · 2024 · confidence medium
Dist., 549 U.S. 1262, 1262 (2007) (noting that the Su- preme Court has “previously dismissed interlocutory appeals from the denials of motions for temporary injunctions once final judg- ment has been entered” and vacating and remanding for circuit court to dismiss appeal as moot).
discussed Cited as authority (rule) Scheff v. Banks
2d Cir. · 2023 · confidence medium
Dist., 549 U.S. 1262, 1262 (2007) (granting petition for writ of certiorari, then remanding with instructions to dismiss as moot an appeal of a denial of a motion for preliminary injunction because district court had, in the interim, entered final judgment dismissing claims); Weisshaus v. Hochul, No. 21-64-cv, 2022 WL 17256755 , at *1 n.2 (2d Cir. Nov. 29, 2022) (summary order) (“[Plaintiff’s] appeal of the district court’s denial of the preliminary injunction is also moot for the independent reason that the district court has dismissed [plaintiff’s] complaint on the merits.”) Moreov…
cited Cited as authority (rule) Koppula v. Jaddou
5th Cir. · 2023 · confidence medium
Harper v. Poway Unified School District, 549 U.S. 1262, 1262 (2007) (citing Pacific Telephone, 265 U.S. at 205–6, and Shaffer, 252 U.S. at 44 ).
discussed Cited as authority (rule) Capriole v. Uber Technologies, Inc.
1st Cir. · 2021 · confidence medium
Dist., 549 U.S. 1262, 1262 (2007); Chaparro-Febus v. Int'l Longshoremen Ass'n, Loc. 1575, 983 F.2d 325 , 331 n.5 (1st Cir. 1992) ("Because the district court's denial of the preliminary injunction was 'merged in' the final judgment dismissing the case, plaintiffs' complaints regarding the preliminary injunction are moot.").
discussed Cited "see" Zamecnik v. Indian Prairie School District 204 Board of Education (2×)
N.D. Ill. · 2007 · signal: see · confidence high
See Harper v. Poway Unified School District, 445 F.3d 1166, 1178-80 (9th Cir.2006), vacated as moot, 549 U.S. 1262 , 127 S.Ct. 1484 , 167 L.Ed.2d 225 (2007).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Tyler Chase HARPER, a Minor, By and Through His Parents Ron HARPER, et ux., et al., petitioners,
v.
POWAY UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT, et al.
06-595.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Mar 5, 2007.
549 U.S. 1262

On petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit. Motion of Kelsie J. Harper for leave to intervene denied. Petition for writ of certiorari granted. Petitioner seeks review of the judgment of the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, which affirmed the district court's denial of petitioner's motion for a preliminary injunction. The district court, however, has now entered final judgment dismissing petitioner's claims for injunctive relief as moot. We have previously dismissed interlocutory appeals from the denials of motions for temporary injunctions once final judgment has been entered. See Pacific Telephone & Telegraph Co. v. Kuykendall, 265 U.S. 196, 205-206, 44 S.Ct. 553, 68 L.Ed. 975 (1924); Shaffer v. Carter, 252 U.S. 37, 44, 40 S.Ct. 221, 64 L.Ed. 445 (1920). In this case, vacatur of the prior judgment is also appropriate to "`clea[r] the path for future relitigation of the issues between the parties and [to] eliminat[e] a judgment, review of which was prevented through happenstance.'" Anderson v. Green, 513 U.S. 557, 560, 115 S.Ct. 1059, 130 L.Ed.2d 1050 (1995) (per curiam) (quoting United States v. Munsingwear, Inc., 340 U.S. 36, 40, 71 S.Ct. 104, 95 L.Ed. 36 (1950)) (alterations in original). The petition for writ of certiorari is granted. The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit with instructions to dismiss the appeal as moot. See United States v. Munsingwear, Inc., supra. Reported below: 445 F.3d 1166.

Justice BREYER dissents.