Hopewell Inc. v. Mobil Oil Co., 784 So. 2d 653 (La. 2001). · Go Syfert
Search
Hopewell Inc. v. Mobil Oil Co., 784 So. 2d 653 (La. 2001). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
33 citation events (33 in the last 25 years) across 4 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Eagle Pipe & Supply, Inc. v. Amerada Hess Corp. (lactapp, 2010-09-08)
Treatment trajectory · 2001 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
2001 2013 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 1 distinct citer. How cited ↗
discussed Cited as authority (rule) Eagle Pipe & Supply, Inc. v. Amerada Hess Corp.
La. Ct. App. · 2010 · confidence medium
But Prados like LeJeune Bros., Inc. v. Goodrich Petroleum Co., L.L.C., 06-1557 (La.App. 3 Cir. 11/28/07) , 981 So.2d 23 , "involve[] rights arising under a lease and [are] distinguishable from the instant facts." Hopewell, Inc. v. Mobil Oil Company, 00-3280 (La.2/9/01), 784 So.2d 653, 653 (per curiam).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
HOPEWELL, INC.
v.
MOBIL OIL COMPANY, et al.
2000-CC-3280.
Supreme Court of Louisiana.
Feb 9, 2001.
784 So. 2d 653
Calogero.
Cited by 9 opinions  |  Published

Granted. Judgment of the Court of Appeal is reversed. Judgment of the trial court denying defendant's exception of no right of action is reinstated. Prados v. South Central Bell Telephone Company, 329 So.2d 744 (La.1975) (on rehearing), which the Court of Appeal relied upon, involves rights arising under a lease and is distinguishable from the instant facts. Case remanded to the trial court for further proceedings.

CALOGERO, C.J., would grant and docket.

VICTORY and TRAYLOR, JJ., would deny the writ.