green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 1×
4.1 score
“instructors and coaches owe a duty of care to persons in their charge not to increase the risks over and above those inherent in the sport.”
Treatment trajectory · 1998 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1998
2012
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 5 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "but see"
State v. Wilkerson
But see State v. Latona, 307 N.J.Super. 387, 389 , 704 A. 2d 1045 (App.Div.), certif. denied, 154 N.J. 607 , 713 A. 2d 498 (1998). [5] In Shipley v. State , the Texas Court of Appeals said: Appellant's assertion that counsel should have informed him that the convictions stemming from the guilty pleas could potentially be used later to enhance the charges the next time he was caught violating the law, implies that counsel should automatically anticipate Appellant would continue to act as a one-man crime wave.
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
Derricotte v. UNITED SKATES OF AMERICA
instructors and coaches owe a duty of care to persons in their charge not to increase the risks over and above those inherent in the sport.
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. McGuire
In State v. Scherzer, 301 N.J.Super. 363, 487-88 , 694 A. 2d 196 (App.Div.), certif. denied, 151 N.J. 466 , 700 A. 2d 878 (1997), we said that "the trial judge must make a probing inquiry into the possible prejudice caused by any jury irregularity, relying on his or her own objective evaluation of the potential for prejudice rather than on the jurors' subjective evaluation of their own impartiality." Once a hearing is conducted, "[a] new trial will be granted where jury misconduct or intrusion of irregular influences into the jury deliberation `could have a tendency to influence the jury in ar…
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. Loftin
(2×)
See State v. Wormley, 305 N.J.Super. 57, 68-70 , 701 A.2d 944 (App.Div.1997) (finding that despite excused juror’s denial of having disclosed to other juror that she knew State’s witness, there was “strong likelihood that, even indirectly or unintentionally, she may well have,” and therefore failure of trial court to voir dire jury required reversal of defendant’s conviction), certif. denied, 154 N.J. 607 , 713 A.2d 498 (1998); Scherzer, supra, 301 N.J.Super. at 487 , 694 A.2d 196 (recognizing that when juror irregularity is brought to trial court’s attention, court must examine wh…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Riley v. Keenan
Compare State v. Wormley, 305 N.J.Super. 57, 65 , 701 A. 2d 944 (App.Div.1997) (evidence that a witness regularly used heroin and marijuana on weekends was "probably insufficient" under N.J.R.E. 406(a) to establish that he used drugs on a Thursday that he claimed he was robbed), certif. denied, 154 N.J. 607 , 713 A. 2d 498 (1998) with State v. Radziwil, 235 N.J.Super. 557, 563-66 , 563 A. 2d 856 (App.Div.1989) (testimony that over a four-year period the defendant patronized the same establishment nearly every weekend and invariably became intoxicated shortly after his arrival there, held admis…
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
ROSANIA
v.
CARMONA
v.
CARMONA
Supreme Court of New Jersey.
May 21, 1998.
Published
Citer courts: New Jersey Superior Court App … (1)