Costanzo v. Gray, 967 A.2d 1220 (Conn. 2009). · Go Syfert
Search
Costanzo v. Gray, 967 A.2d 1220 (Conn. 2009). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
6 citation events (6 in the last 25 years) across 2 distinct courts.
Top citers, strongest first. 1 distinct citer. How cited ↗
discussed Cited "see, e.g." State v. Skyes
Conn. App. Ct. · 2025 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence low
See, e.g., State v. Moore, 112 Conn. App. 569, 578 , 963 A.2d 1019 (exclu- sionary rule was inapplicable in revocation of probation case where ‘‘primary search’’ of defendant’s apartment was performed by probation officers, even though police were eventually present and arrested defendant), cert. denied, 291 Conn. 905 , 967 A.2d 1221 (2009); State v. Fuessenich, 50 Conn. App. 187, 198 , 717 A.2d 801 (1998) (court in revocation of probation case improp- erly applied exclusionary rule to suppress urinalysis results where probation officer, rather than police, required defendant to subm…
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Thomas Costanzo
v.
F. Scott Gray Et Al.
Supreme Court of Connecticut.
Mar 31, 2009.
967 A.2d 1220
Philip F. von Kuhn, in support of the petition., Richard A. O’Connor, in opposition.
McLachlan.
Published

The plaintiffs petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 112 Conn. App. 614 (AC 29228), is denied.

MCLACHLAN, J.,

did not participate in the consideration of or decision on this petition.