green
Positive treatment
3.7 score
Treatment trajectory · 1995 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1995
2010
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 3 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
Vickowski v. Hukowicz
Thus, a plaintiff cannot satisfy his burden of causation by “relying solely on the temporal proximity of the [allegedly] protected [speech] to the alleged retaliatory conduct” without identifying “independent facts to support the allegation that his [allegedly] protected speech substantially motivated [the defendants] to punish him.” Id. at 502-03.
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Recarey-Salas
See United States v. Coplin, 68 F.3d 455 (1st Cir. 1995) (per curiam) (unpublished) (declining to allow defendant to introduce new evidence at resentencing where defendant "had a full opportunity to present mitigating evidence . . . when he was initially sentenced" and "[t]he technical nature of our remand did not change the nature of the information relevant to sentencing"); see also United States v. Reyes-Rivas, 909 F.3d 466 , 470 n.3 (1st Cir. 2018) (remanding for resentencing on existing record where government had incentive and opportunity in first instance to ensure district court had ev…
cited
Cited "see"
Dopp v. Yari
See Dopp v. Pritzker (Dopp VI), 68 F.3d 455 (Table), 1995 WL 628569, *4 (1st Cir.1995).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
United States
v.
Oickle
v.
Oickle
95-1448.
Court of Appeals for the First Circuit.
Oct 12, 1995.
Unpublished
NOTICE: First Circuit Local Rule 36.2(b)6 states unpublished opinions may be cited only in related cases.
UNITED STATES, Appellee,
v.
Rex Forbes OICKLE, Defendant--Appellant.
NO. 95-1448.
United States Court of Appeals, First Circuit.
Oct. 12, 1995.
F. Mark Terison, Assistant United States Attorney, with whom Jay P. McCloskey, United States Attorney, and Elizabeth C. Woodcock, Assistant United States Attorney, were on brief for appellee.
Before TORRUELLA, STAHL and LYNCH, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM.
1
Upon full review of the record in this case, and after hearing argument from counsel, we affirm the decision of the district court.
2
Affirmed.