Vitosh v. Vitosh, 397 N.W.2d 35 (Neb. 1986). · Go Syfert
Search
Vitosh v. Vitosh, 397 N.W.2d 35 (Neb. 1986). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
1 citation event across 1 distinct court.
Strongest positive: Wehling v. Wehling (neb, 1987-01-16)
Top citers, strongest first. 1 distinct citer. How cited ↗
cited Cited "see" Wehling v. Wehling
Neb. · 1987 · signal: see · confidence high
See Vitosh v. Vitosh, ante p. 196, 397 N.W.2d 35 (1986).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Michael D. Vitosh, Appellant,
v.
Clara M. Vitosh, Appellee
86-072.
Nebraska Supreme Court.
Dec 5, 1986.
397 N.W.2d 35
James G. Sharp of Everson, Wullschleger, Sutter, Sharp, Korslund & Willet, for appellant., James M. Kelley of Professional Legal Associates of Nebraska, P.C., for appellee.
Krivosha, Boslaugh, White, Hastings, Caporale, Shanahan, Grant.
Cited by 1 opinion  |  Published
Per Curiam.

Michael D. Vitosh appeals a judgment of the district court for Gage County authorizing his former wife, Clara, to remove their daughter from the state and denying his application for a reduction in child support.

We have reviewed the record de novo, as we are required, to determine whether the district court abused its discretion. See, Maack v. Maack, 223 Neb. 342, 389 N.W.2d 318 (1986); Meyers v. Meyers, 222 Neb. 370, 383 N.W.2d 784 (1986). Our review leads us to the conclusion that the district court did not abuse its discretion, and therefore the judgment entered by the district court should be affirmed.

The judgment is affirmed.

Affirmed.