green
Positive treatment
2.6 score
Top citers, strongest first. 2 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "see"
Bobrick Corporation v. Santana Products, Inc.
See Santana Prods., Inc. v. Bobrick Corp., 249 F.Supp.2d, 463, 475 (M.D.Pa.2003), aff'd in part and rev’d in part, 401 F.3d 123 (3d Cir.), cert. denied, 546 U.S. 1031 , 126 S.Ct. 734 , 163 L.Ed.2d 569 (2005).
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. Morlock
See People v. Williams, 472 Mich. 308, 316 , 696 N.W.2d 636 (finding no violation in asking travel-plan questions of driver and passengers, including follow-up questions) ("Implicit in the authority to ask these questions is the authority to ask follow-up questions when the initial answers given are suspicious."), cert. denied 546 U.S. 1031 , 126 S.Ct. 734 , 163 L.Ed.2d 569 (2005); United States v. Garcia, 167 Fed.Appx. 737, 740 (10th Cir.2006) (finding no violation in asking passenger for registration papers after determining that driver could not show he was "entitled to operate the vehicle"…
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
SANTANA PRODUCTS, INC.
v.
BOBRICK WASHROOM EQUIP.
v.
BOBRICK WASHROOM EQUIP.
05-185.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Nov 28, 2005.
126 S. Ct. 734
Published
The petition for writ of certiorari is denied.