green
Positive treatment
1.8 score
Treatment trajectory · 1985 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1985
2005
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 1 distinct citer.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
James Hitesman v. Bridgeway, Inc. (072466)
(2×)
Nor does the ANA Code prescribe for Bridgeway a “readily discernible course of action that is recognized to be in the public interest,” from which we ean discern a “clear mandate of public policy.” N.J.S.A. 34:19—3(c)(3); Maw, supra, 179 N.J. at 444, 846 A.2d 604 ; see also Warthen v. Toms River Cmty. Mem’l Hosp., 199 N.J.Super. 18, 20-21, 28 , 488 A.2d 229 (App.Div.) (finding that “even if [the court] were to make the dubious assumption that the [ANA Code] represents a clear expression of public policy,” plaintiffs personal morals, not mandate of public policy, were source of …
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
CORRINE WARTHEN
v.
TOMS RIVER COMMUNITY MEMORIAL HOSPITAL.
v.
TOMS RIVER COMMUNITY MEMORIAL HOSPITAL.
Supreme Court of New Jersey.
May 6, 1985.
Cited by 1 opinion | Published
Petition for certification denied. (See 199 N.J. Super. 18)