Hill v. Mitchell, 126 S. Ct. 744 (2005). · Go Syfert
Hill v. Mitchell, 126 S. Ct. 744 (2005). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
18 citation events (18 in the last 25 years) across 5 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Bowen v. Haney (kywd, 2008-04-08)
Top citers, strongest first. 3 distinct citers. How cited ↗
cited Cited "see" Bowen v. Haney
W.D. Ky. · 2008 · signal: see · confidence high
See Hill v. Mitchell, 400 F.3d 308, 329 (6th Cir.), cert. denied, 546 U.S. 1039 , 126 S.Ct. 744 , 163 L.Ed.2d 582 (2005).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Frederick Dickerson v. Margaret Bagley, Warden (2×)
6th Cir. · 2006 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence low
See, e.g., Hill v. Mitchell, 400 F.3d 308, 331-32 (6th Cir.), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 126 S.Ct. 744 , 163 L.Ed.2d 582 (2005)(rejecting claim of ineffective assistance of counsel where a mitigation psychologist was not retained until the day before the mitigation hearing, as the mitigation theory that the psychologist presented did not differ materially from the one that would have been presented with more preparation); Martin, 280 F.3d at 614 (psychologist’s post-conviction assertion that petitioner suffered from a “severe psychological disorder” did not show that petitioner was prejud…
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Dickerson v. Bagley
6th Cir. · 2006 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence low
See, e.g., Hill v. Mitchell, 400 F.3d 308, 331-32 (6th Cir.), cert. denied, 126 S. Ct. 744 (2005)(rejecting claim of ineffective assistance of counsel where a mitigation psychologist was not retained until the day before the mitigation hearing, as the mitigation theory that the psychologist presented did not differ materially from the one that would have been presented with more preparation); Martin, 280 F.3d at 614 (psychologist’s post-conviction assertion that petitioner suffered from a “severe psychological disorder” did not show that petitioner was prejudiced by the use of a psycholo…
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
JEFFREY D. HILL
v.
MITCHELL, WARDEN
05-6535.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Nov 28, 2005.
126 S. Ct. 744
Published

The petition for writ of certiorari is denied.