green
Positive treatment
2.7 score
Top citers, strongest first. 3 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
cited
Cited "see"
Bowen v. Haney
See Hill v. Mitchell, 400 F.3d 308, 329 (6th Cir.), cert. denied, 546 U.S. 1039 , 126 S.Ct. 744 , 163 L.Ed.2d 582 (2005).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Frederick Dickerson v. Margaret Bagley, Warden
(2×)
See, e.g., Hill v. Mitchell, 400 F.3d 308, 331-32 (6th Cir.), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 126 S.Ct. 744 , 163 L.Ed.2d 582 (2005)(rejecting claim of ineffective assistance of counsel where a mitigation psychologist was not retained until the day before the mitigation hearing, as the mitigation theory that the psychologist presented did not differ materially from the one that would have been presented with more preparation); Martin, 280 F.3d at 614 (psychologist’s post-conviction assertion that petitioner suffered from a “severe psychological disorder” did not show that petitioner was prejud…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Dickerson v. Bagley
See, e.g., Hill v. Mitchell, 400 F.3d 308, 331-32 (6th Cir.), cert. denied, 126 S. Ct. 744 (2005)(rejecting claim of ineffective assistance of counsel where a mitigation psychologist was not retained until the day before the mitigation hearing, as the mitigation theory that the psychologist presented did not differ materially from the one that would have been presented with more preparation); Martin, 280 F.3d at 614 (psychologist’s post-conviction assertion that petitioner suffered from a “severe psychological disorder” did not show that petitioner was prejudiced by the use of a psycholo…
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
JEFFREY D. HILL
v.
MITCHELL, WARDEN
v.
MITCHELL, WARDEN
05-6535.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Nov 28, 2005.
126 S. Ct. 744
Published
The petition for writ of certiorari is denied.