Enright v. Lubow, 517 A.2d 386 (N.J. 1986). · Go Syfert
Search
Enright v. Lubow, 517 A.2d 386 (N.J. 1986). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
49 citation events (9 in the last 25 years) across 8 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Bonnco Petrol, Inc. v. Epstein (nj, 1989-07-13)
Treatment trajectory · 1987 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1987 2006 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 3 distinct citers. How cited ↗
discussed Cited "see" Bonnco Petrol, Inc. v. Epstein
N.J. · 1989 · signal: see · confidence high
See Enright v. Lubow, 202 N.J.Super. 58, 72 (App.Div.1985), certif. den., 104 N.J. 376 (1986); Foont-Freedenfeld v. Electro-Protective, 126 N.J.Super. 254, 257 (App.Div.1973), aff’d, 64 N.J. 197 (1974); *612 Gherardi v. Trenton Bd. of Educ. 53 N.J.Super. 349, 366 (App.Div.1958).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Rutgers Casualty Insurance v. Lacroix (2×)
N.J. · 2008 · signal: see also · confidence low
“The object of equitable remedies such as ... rescission is to restore the parties to the status quo ante and prevent the party who is responsible for the misrepresentation from gaining a benefit.” Bonnco Petrol, Inc. v. Epstein, 115 N.J. 599, 612 , 560 A.2d 655 (1989); see also Enright v. Lubow, 202 N.J.Super. 58, 72 , 493 A.2d 1288 (App.Div.1985), certif. denied, 104 N.J. 376 , 517 A.2d 386 (1986).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Lingar v. Live-In Companions, Inc. (2×)
N.J. Super. Ct. App. Div. · 1997 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence low
See, e.g., Enright v. Lubow, 202 N.J.Super. 58, 76 , 493 A.2d 1288 (App.Div.1985), certif. denied, 104 N.J. 376 , 517 A.2d 386 (1986), reconsidered and aff'd, 215 N.J.Super. 306 , 521 A.2d 1300 (App.Div.), certif. denied, 108 N.J. 193 , 528 A.2d 19 (1987).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Robert E. Enright, Et Al.
v.
Harold W. Lubow, Et Al.
Supreme Court of New Jersey.
May 6, 1986.
517 A.2d 386
Cited by 2 opinions  |  Published

Petition for certification is denied, without prejudice to an application, within 14 days of the filing date of this order, to the Appellate Division for reconsideration of its disposition on the counsel fee issue.