discussed Cited "see, e.g." State v. JA See also State v. Fraction, 206 N.J.Super. 532, 536 , 503 A. 2d 336 (App. Div.1985), certif. denied, 104 N.J. 434 , 517 A. 2d 426 (1986) (holding that cunnilingus, by licking the labia, constitutes an act of sexual penetration, although the actor's tongue is not inserted into the vagina); State in the Interest of S.M., 284 N.J.Super. *786 611, 617, 666 A. 2d 177 (App.Div.1995) (holding that fellatio constitutes an act of sexual penetration notwithstanding the fact that the victim's penis does not enter the actor's mouth because touching of the mouth and penis is sufficient to prove a violation…

discussed Cited "see, e.g." State v. J.A. See also State v. Fraction, 206 N.J.Super. 532, 536 , 503 A.2d 336 (App.Div.1985), certif. denied, 104 N.J. 434 , 517 A.2d 426 (1986) (holding that cunnilingus, by licking the labia, constitutes an act of sexual penetration, although the actor’s tongue is not inserted into the vagina); State in the Interest of S.M., 284 N.J.Super. 611 , 617, 666 A.2d 177 (App.Div.1995) (holding that fellatio constitutes an act of sexual penetration notwithstanding the fact that the victim’s penis does not enter the actor’s mouth because touching of the mouth and penis is sufficient to prove a violation).