neutral
Cited (no substantive treatment)
0.6 score
Treatment trajectory · 1995 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1995
2010
2026
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Kim Moss, Appellant,
v.
JNK Capital Ltd., Defendant, and Supermarkets General Corp., Doing Business as Pathmark, Respondent
v.
JNK Capital Ltd., Defendant, and Supermarkets General Corp., Doing Business as Pathmark, Respondent
New York Court of Appeals.
Jun 8, 1995.
655 N.E.2d 393
APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL, Ciarelli & Dempsey, Melville (Patricia A. Dempsey of counsel), for appellant., Krai, Clerkin, Redmond, Ryan, Perry & Girvan, Mineola (Henry M. Primavera of counsel), for respondent.
Cited by 20 opinions | Published
OPINION OF THE COURT
On review of submissions pursuant to section 500.4 of the Rules of the Court of Appeals (22 NYCRR 500.4), order affirmed, with costs, for the reasons stated in the memorandum of the Appellate Division (211 AD2d 769).
Concur: Chief Judge Kaye and Judges Simons, Titone, Bellacosa, Smith, Levine and Ciparick.