State v. Henderson, 895 A.2d 800 (Conn. 2006). · Go Syfert
Search
State v. Henderson, 895 A.2d 800 (Conn. 2006). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
17 citation events (17 in the last 25 years) across 3 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Jefferson Solar, LLC v. FuelCell Energy, Inc. (connappct, 2024-04-16)
Top citers, strongest first. 5 distinct citers. How cited ↗
discussed Cited "see" Jefferson Solar, LLC v. FuelCell Energy, Inc.
Conn. App. Ct. · 2024 · signal: see · confidence high
See AAIS Corp. v. Dept. of Administrative Services, 93 Conn. App. 327 , 332–33, 888 A.2d 1127 (unsuccessful bidder lacked standing to seek injunctive relief because there was ‘‘no allegation that any ex parte communications with other bidders took place or that the department was favoring the use of one brand of product over another in the bidding process’’), cert. denied, 277 Conn. 927 , 895 A.2d 798 (2006).
discussed Cited "see" State v. Carter
Conn. Super. Ct. · 2011 · signal: see · confidence high
Such challenges do not fall within the scope of the trial court’s jurisdiction for a motion to correct a sentence imposed in an illegal manner; see State v. Henderson, 93 Conn. App. 61, 74-75 , 888 A.2d 123 , cert. denied, 277 Conn. 927 , 895 A.2d 800 (2006); even with due consideration given to the expansion contemplated by the Supreme Court in State v. Parker, supra, 295 Conn. 839 -40.
discussed Cited "see" State v. Gaymon
Conn. App. Ct. · 2006 · signal: see · confidence high
See State v. Gaymon, 93 Conn. App. 569 , 889 A.2d 880 , cert. denied, 277 Conn. 927 , 895 A.2d 799 (2006). 2 “[A] defendant can prevail on a claim of constitutional error not preserved at trial only if all of the following conditions are met: (1) the record is adequate to review the alleged claim of error; (2) the claim is of constitutional magnitude alleging the violation of a fundamental right; (3) the alleged constitutional violation clearly exists and clearly deprived the defendant of a fair trial; and (4) if subject to harmless error analysis, the state has failed to demonstrate harmles…
discussed Cited "see, e.g." State v. Connelly
Conn. App. Ct. · 2011 · signal: see also · confidence low
As this court has long recognized, “[sentences imposed in an illegal manner have been defined as being within the relevant statutory limits but . . . imposed in a way which violates [a] defendant’s right ... to be addressed personally at sentencing and to speak in mitigation of punishment ... or his right to be sentenced by a judge relying on accurate information or considerations solely in the record, or his right that the government keep its plea agreement promises . . . .” (Internal quotation marks omitted.) State v. McNellis, supra, 15 Conn. App. 444 ; see State v. Parker, 295 Conn. …
discussed Cited "see, e.g." State v. Tabone
Conn. · 2006 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence low
See, e.g., State v. Henderson, 93 Conn. App. 61, 66 , 888 A.2d 132 , cert. denied, 277 Conn. 927 , 895 A.2d 800 (2006); State v. Pagan, 75 Conn. App. 423, 429 , 816 A.2d 635 , cert. denied, 265 Conn. 901 , 829 A.2d 420 (2003).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
STATE of Connecticut
v.
Daniel J. HENDERSON.
Supreme Court of Connecticut.
Mar 23, 2006.
895 A.2d 800
Published

Daniel J. Henderson, pro se, in support of the petition.

The defendant's petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 93 Conn.App. 61, 888 A.2d 132 (2006), is denied.