green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 1×
5.1 score
G Cite
cited 2× by 1 distinct case, last quoted 1976 ·
…under such circumstances, it was for the jury to say whether devaney, conscious of the risk of driving without a seat belt and the possibility of being involved in an accident, acted unreasonably in driving his car on the day in question.
⚠ not in text
Treatment trajectory · 1974 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1974
2000
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 5 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
examined
Cited as authority (quoted)
Johnson v. Clark Equipment Company
(2×)
under such circumstances, it was for the jury to say whether devaney, conscious of the risk of driving without a seat belt and the possibility of being involved in an accident, acted unreasonably in driving his car on the day in question.
discussed
Cited "see"
United States Court of Appeals, Third Circuit
(2×)
See Devaney v. Sarno, 125 N.J.Super. 414, 419 , 311 A.2d 208, 210 (1973), aff'd, 65 N.J. 235 , 323 A.2d 449 (1974), ('there had to be an accident before the effect of the defective (seatbelt) came into play').
discussed
Cited "see"
Huddell v. Levin
(2×)
See Devaney v. Sarno, 125 N.J.Super. 414, 419 , 311 A.2d 208, 210 (1973), aff’d, 65 N.J. 235 , 323 A.2d 449 (1974), (“there had to be an accident before the effect of the defective [seatbelt] came into play”).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Kimberly Ann Sallee, Individually and as Next Friend of Lucas Gregory Durkop and Maria Christina Rivera, Matthew James Sallee, and James Allan Sallee v. Matthew R. Stewart and Diana Stewart D/B/A Stewartland Holsteins
In Dykes v. Scotts Bluff County Agricultural Society, Inc., the Nebraska Supreme Court held that viewing livestock events at a county fair was not a recreational purpose under Nebraska’s recreational use statute because “the activities listed in [the statute] are more physical than not, generally require the outdoors, and are not ‘spectator sports.’” 260 Neb. 375 , 617 N.W.2d 817 , 823 (2000); see also Boileau v. De Cecco, 125 N.J.Super. 263 , 310 A.2d 497, 499-500 (N.J.Super.Ct.App.Div.1973), aff'd, 65 N.J. 234 , 323 A.2d 449 (1974); Matthews v. Elk Pioneer Days, 64 Wash. App. 433 ,…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Monteville v. Terrebonne Par. Con. Gov't
See, e.g., Boileau v. DeCecco, 125 N.J.Super. 263 , 310 A.2d 497 (1973), aff'd per curiam, 65 N.J. 234 , 323 A.2d 449 (1974); Harrison v. Middlesex Water Co., 80 N.J. 391 , 403 A.2d 910 (1979); Copeland v. Larson, 46 Wis.2d 337 , 174 N.W.2d 745 (1970); LePoidevin v. Wilson, 111 Wis.2d 116 , 330 N.W.2d 555 (1983); Gibson v. Keith, 492 A.2d 241 (Del.1985); Arias v. State Farm Fire & Casualty Co., 426 So.2d 1136 (Fla.App.1983); Walker v. City of Scottsdale, 163 Ariz. 206 , 786 P.2d 1057 (Ariz.Ct.App.1989); Kucher v. County of Pierce, 24 Wash.App. 281 , 600 P.2d 683 (1979); Page, The Law of Premis…
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Robert A. Devaney, an Infant by His Guardian Ad Litem John R. Devaney and John R. Devaney and Jeanne Devaney, Individually, Plaintiffs-Respondents,
v.
Louis Sarno and Central Volkswagen Inc., Defendants and Volkswagen of America, Inc., Defendant-Appellant
v.
Louis Sarno and Central Volkswagen Inc., Defendants and Volkswagen of America, Inc., Defendant-Appellant
Supreme Court of New Jersey.
Jun 10, 1974.
Mr. John T. Dolan argued the cause for appellants (Messrs. Crummy, O’Neill, Del Deo & Dolan, attorneys; Messrs. Herzfeld & Rubin, P. C. of the New York Bar, of Counsel)., Mr. Arthur C. Gundersdorf argued the cause for respondents.
Per Curiam.
Cited by 8 opinions | Published
Citer courts: Oregon Supreme Court (2)
Per Curiam.
The judgment is affirmed substantially for the reasons expressed by the Appellate Division, 125 N. J. Super. 414.
For affirmance — Chief Justice Hughes, and Justices Jacobs, Hall, Mountain, Sullivan, Pashman and Clifford — 7.
For reversal — Fone.