State v. Silva, 896 A.2d 103 (Conn. 2006). · Go Syfert
Search
State v. Silva, 896 A.2d 103 (Conn. 2006). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
26 citation events (26 in the last 25 years) across 2 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: In re Paulo T. (connappct, 2022-07-18)
Treatment trajectory · 2006 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
2006 2016 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 2 distinct citers. How cited ↗
discussed Cited "see" In re Paulo T.
Conn. App. Ct. · 2022 · signal: see · confidence high
A finding of fact is clearly erroneous when there is no evidence in the record to support it . . . or when although there is evidence to support it, the reviewing court on the entire evidence is left with the definite and firm conviction that a mistake has been committed.’’ (Citation omitted; internal quotation marks omitted.) Id., 792–93; see generally In re Patricia C., 93 Conn. App. 25 , 32–33, 887 A.2d 929 , cert. denied, 277 Conn. 931 , 896 A.2d 101 (2006).16 A The respondent first argues the court failed to identify all of the factors that led to the petitioner’s removal.
discussed Cited "see" In re Paulo T.
Conn. App. Ct. · 2022 · signal: see · confidence high
A finding of fact is clearly erroneous when there is no evidence in the record to support it . . . or when although there is evidence to support it, the reviewing court on the entire evidence is left with the definite and firm conviction that a mistake has been committed.’’ (Citation omitted; internal quotation marks omitted.) Id., 792–93; see generally In re Patricia C., 93 Conn. App. 25 , 32–33, 887 A.2d 929 , cert. denied, 277 Conn. 931 , 896 A.2d 101 (2006).16 A The respondent first argues the court failed to identify all of the factors that led to the petitioner’s removal.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
State of Connecticut
v.
Madalena Silva
SC 17638.
Supreme Court of Connecticut.
Mar 31, 2006.
896 A.2d 103
Ronald G. Weller, senior assistant state’s attorney, in support of the petition., Norman A. Pattis, in opposition.
Cited by 1 opinion  |  Published

The petition by the state of Connecticut for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 93 Conn. App. 349 (AC 25517), is granted, limited to the following issue:

“Did the Appellate Court properly conclude that there was insufficient evidence to support the defendant’s conviction on two counts of interfering with an officer in violation of General Statutes § 53a-167a?”