Fuhrman v. WCAB, 540 A.2d 267 (Pa. 1988). · Go Syfert
Search
Fuhrman v. WCAB, 540 A.2d 267 (Pa. 1988). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
50 citation events (8 in the last 25 years) across 5 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: O'Brien v. Workers' Compensation Appeal Board (pacommwct, 1997-02-28)
Treatment trajectory · 1988 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1988 2007 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 6 distinct citers. How cited ↗
discussed Cited as authority (rule) O'Brien v. Workers' Compensation Appeal Board (2×)
Pa. Commw. Ct. · 1997 · confidence medium
Section 306(11) suggests that there may be reimbursement for medical expenses after the statute of limitations has expired, and separates the concept of “medical services” from the concept of “compensation.” Id. at 334.
discussed Cited as authority (rule) Bellefonte Area School District v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal Board
Pa. Commw. Ct. · 1993 · confidence medium
Knowing the extensive history of Section 306(f) of the Act, so exhaustively detailed in Fuhrman v. Workmen’s Compensation Appeal Board (Clemens Supermarket), 100 Pa.Commonwealth Ct. 577, 515 A.2d 331 (1986), appeal dismissed as improvidently granted, 518 Pa. 59 , 540 A.2d 267 *315 (1988), and Berwick, I believe that it makes more common sense to state the proposition: if the legislature had intended to include medical benefits in the three-year statutory limitation, it would have expressly stated so.
cited Cited as authority (rule) Brown v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal Board
Pa. Commw. Ct. · 1991 · confidence medium
Fuhrman v. Workmen’s Compensation Appeal Board (Clemens Supermarket), 100 Pa.Commonwealth Ct. 577, 515 A.2d 331 (1986), appeal dismissed, 518 Pa. 59 , 540 A.2d 267 *579 (1988).
discussed Cited "see" Petras v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal Board (2×)
Pa. Commw. Ct. · 1993 · signal: see · confidence high
See generally Fuhrman v. Workmen’s Compensation Appeal Board (Clemens Supermarket), 100 Pa.Commonwealth Ct. 577, 515 A.2d 331 (1986), appeal dismissed as having been improvidently granted, 518 Pa. 59 , 540 A.2d 267 -68 (1988). .
examined Cited "see" Loose v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal Board (4×)
Pa. Commw. Ct. · 1991 · signal: see · confidence high
See Fuhrman v. Workmen’s Compensation Appeal Board (Clemens Supermarket), 100 Pa.Commonwealth Ct. 577, 515 A.2d 331 (1986), appeal dismissed, 518 Pa. 59 , 540 A.2d 267 (1988).
discussed Cited "see" Johnson v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal Board (2×)
Pa. Commw. Ct. · 1991 · signal: see · confidence high
See Fuhrman v. Workmen’s Compensation Appeal Board (Clemens Supermarket), 100 Pa.Commonwealth Ct. 577, 515 A.2d 331 (1986), appeal dismissed, 518 Pa. 59 , 540 A.2d 267 (1988); Deremer v. Workmen’s Compensation Appeal Board, 61 Pa.Commonwealth Ct. 415, 433 A.2d 926 (1981). *180 Respondent’s failure to adhere to the requirements of Section 306(f)(2)(ii) by failing to file a petition for review of the reasonableness or necessity of Claimant’s medical expenses and its unilateral refusal to pay those expenses, despite Claimant’s submission of medical reports, is a clear violation of the A…
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
George FUHRMAN
v.
WORKMEN'S COMPENSATION APPEAL BOARD (CLEMENS SUPERMARKET). Appeal of CLEMENS SUPERMARKET.
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.
Apr 26, 1988.
540 A.2d 267
Per Curiam.
Published

John R. Lenahan, Jr., Kathleen A. Lenahan, Scranton, for appellant.

Mark B. Segal, Philadelphia, Jerome H. Gerber, Irwin W. Aronson, James A. Diamond, Harrisburg, for amicus — AFL-CIO.

Prior report: 100 Pa.Cmwlth. 577, 515 A.2d 331.

[*60] ORDER

PER CURIAM:

Appeal dismissed as having been improvidently granted.