green
Positive treatment
6.7 score
Treatment trajectory · 2010 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
2010
2018
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 9 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "see"
Byrd v. Commissioner of Correction
On the basis of our liberal reading of the language in his petition; see Mourning v. Commissioner of Correction , 120 Conn.App. 612 , 624-25, 992 A.2d 1169 , cert. denied, 297 Conn. 919 , 996 A.2d 1192 (2010) ; we agree that the petitioner made two claims in support of count one.
cited
Cited "see"
Barton v. Norwalk
See Sinotte v. Water- bury, 121 Conn. App. 420, 437 , 995 A.2d 131 , cert. denied, 297 Conn. 921 , 996 A.2d 1192 (2010).
cited
Cited "see"
DiMiceli v. Cheshire
See Sinotte v. Waterbury, 121 Conn. App. 420 , 428–31, 995 A.2d 131 , cert. denied, 297 Conn. 92 , 996 A.2d 1192 (2010).
discussed
Cited "see"
Davis v. Commissioner of Correction
See Grant v. Commis- sioner of Correction, 121 Conn. App. 295 , 301–302, 995 A.2d 641 (‘‘[t]he ambiguous pleadings . . . and the fail- ure of the petitioner to advise the court of her theory during the habeas trial provide a sufficient legal basis to affirm the court’s dismissal of [the pertinent] count . . . of the habeas petition’’), cert. denied, 297 Conn. 920 , 996 A.2d 1192 (2010).
discussed
Cited "see"
Folsom v. Zoning Board of Appeals
See Mourning v. Commissioner of Correction, 120 Conn. App. 612 , 624–25, 992 A.2d 1169 (construing pro se pleadings liberally), cert. denied, 297 Conn. 919 , 996 A.2d 1192 (2010). 3 We take judicial notice of the plaintiff’s Superior Court filings in the present case and related actions filed by the plaintiff.
discussed
Cited "see"
McMillion v. Commissioner of Correction
See Grant v. Commissioner of Correction, 121 Conn. App. 295, 299, n.2 , 995 A.2d 641 (as habeas trial is without jury, motion for directed verdict would be more accurately presented as motion for dismissal for failure to make out prima facie case under Practice Book § 15-8), cert. denied, 297 Conn. 920 , 996 A.2d 1192 (2010); see also Young v. Bridgeport, 135 Conn. App. 699 , 705 n.7, 42 A.3d 514 (2012) (treating motion for directed verdict in accordance with substance as opposed to label and noting challenge to prima facie case properly raised as motion to dismiss pursuant to Practice Book �…
cited
Cited "see"
Coleman v. Commissioner of Correction
See Mourning v. Commissioner of Correction, 120 Conn. App. 612, 624-26 , 992 A.2d 1169 , cert. denied, 297 Conn. 919 , 996 A.2d 1192 (2010).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Wojtkiewicz v. Middlesex Hospital
David Marder & Associates, LLC, 110 Conn. App. 679, 684 , 956 A.2d 581 (2008); see also Sinotte v. Waterbury, 121 Conn. App. 420, 440 , 995 A.2d 131 (whether plaintiffs’ claims are barred by applicable statutes of limitation presents question of law to which we afford plenary review), cert. denied, 297 Conn. 921 , 996 A.2d 1192 (2010).” (Citation omitted; internal quotation marks omitted.) Mollica v. Toohey, 134 Conn. App. 607, 610-11 , 39 A.3d 1202 (2012).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Mollica v. Toohey
David Marder & Associates, LLC, 110 Conn. App. 679, 684 , 956 A.2d 581 (2008); see also Sinotte v. Waterbury, 121 Conn. App. 420, 440 , 995 A.2d 131 (whether plaintiffs’ claims are barred by applicable statutes of limitation presents question of law to which we afford plenary review), cert. denied, 297 Conn. 921 , 996 A.2d 1192 (2010).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
In re EARL B.
Supreme Court of Connecticut.
Jul 1, 2010.
Published
James Jude Connolly, supervisory assistant public defender, in support of the petition.
Melissa L. Streeto, assistant state's attorney, in opposition.
The petition by the respondent Earl B. for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 121 Conn.App. 269, 994 A.2d 713 (2010), is denied.