green
Positive treatment
6.8 score
Treatment trajectory · 2010 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
2010
2018
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 7 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "see"
Byrd v. Commissioner of Correction
On the basis of our liberal reading of the language in his petition; see Mourning v. Commissioner of Correction , 120 Conn.App. 612 , 624-25, 992 A.2d 1169 , cert. denied, 297 Conn. 919 , 996 A.2d 1192 (2010) ; we agree that the petitioner made two claims in support of count one.
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. Johnson
See State v. Payne, 121 Conn.App. 308 , 318, 996 A.2d 302 (neither precharge objection nor postcharge exception included ground for objection), cert. denied, 297 Conn. 919 , 996 A.2d 1193 (2010) ; see also State v. Lee, supra, at 453, 52 A.3d 736 (defense counsel voiced concern about definition of conspiracy but not about instruction on intent element of conspiracy).
discussed
Cited "see"
Folsom v. Zoning Board of Appeals
See Mourning v. Commissioner of Correction, 120 Conn. App. 612 , 624–25, 992 A.2d 1169 (construing pro se pleadings liberally), cert. denied, 297 Conn. 919 , 996 A.2d 1192 (2010). 3 We take judicial notice of the plaintiff’s Superior Court filings in the present case and related actions filed by the plaintiff.
cited
Cited "see"
Coleman v. Commissioner of Correction
See Mourning v. Commissioner of Correction, 120 Conn. App. 612, 624-26 , 992 A.2d 1169 , cert. denied, 297 Conn. 919 , 996 A.2d 1192 (2010).
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. Boutilier
See State v. Payne, 121 Conn. App. 308 , 31-4-15 and 315 n.3, 996 A.2d 302 , cert. denied, 297 Conn. 919 , 996 A.2d 1193 (2010). 5 As noted in part K of this opinion, the defendant resided in the home in which the crimes took place, and the defendant and his lawyer had access to drawings and photographs of the crime scene, obviating the need to actually go to the scene together in order to prepare a defense. 6 During trial, the defendant made an oral motion for the jury to be allowed to view the crime scene, which was denied by the court. 7 Practice Book § 42-6, “View by Jury of Place or Th…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Carlson
Moreover, the defendant failed to take an exception ‘‘immediately after the charge [was] delivered.’’ Practice Book § 42-16; see also State v. Payne, 121 Conn. App. 308, 318 , 996 A.2d 302 (defendant failed to distinctly raise claim of instruc- tional error at trial when neither precharge objection nor postcharge exception included ground for objec- tion), cert. denied, 297 Conn. 919 , 996 A.2d 1193 (2010); State v. Silva, supra, 113 Conn. App. 495 (‘‘The defen- dant . . . did not object to the specific contents of the charge . . . .
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Stechel v. Foster
See, e.g., State v. Payne, 121 Conn. App. 308, 312 , 996 A.2d 302 , cert. denied, 297 Conn. 919 , 996 A.2d 1193 (2010).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
State of Connecticut
v.
Gary J. Tricarico
v.
Gary J. Tricarico
Supreme Court of Connecticut.
Jul 1, 2010.
Deborah G. Stevenson, special public defender, in support of the petition., Lisa A. Riggione, senior assistant state’s attorney, in opposition.
Cited by 1 opinion | Published
The defendant’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 121 Conn. App. 75 (AC 29939), is denied.
[*920] Deborah G. Stevenson, special public defender, in support of the petition. Lisa A. Riggione, senior assistant state’s attorney, in opposition. Decided July 1, 2010