neutral
Cited (no substantive treatment)
0.7 score
G Cite
cited 2× by 1 distinct case, last quoted 2009 ·
…it is far less confusing than first telling the jury that a doctor is not responsible for an error in judgment and then providing an exception if the judgment was below the standard of care.
⚠ not in text
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
D'ORAZIO
v.
PARLEE & TATEM RADIOLOGIC ASSOCIATES, LTD.
v.
PARLEE & TATEM RADIOLOGIC ASSOCIATES, LTD.
265 EAL (2004).
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.
Mar 16, 2005.
Cited by 5 opinions | Published
Disposition of petition for allowance of appeal denied.