State v. Antonsen, 525 A.2d 1048 (Me. 1987). · Go Syfert
Search
State v. Antonsen, 525 A.2d 1048 (Me. 1987). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
6 citation events across 4 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: People v. Ellison (colo, 2000-12-04)
Top citers, strongest first. 1 distinct citer. How cited ↗
discussed Cited as authority (rule) People v. Ellison (2×)
Colo. · 2000 · confidence medium
See, e.g., People v. Turner, 64 Ill.2d 183 , 354 N.E.2d 897, 898 (1976) (determining that the offense of driving while license revoked consists of only two elements: driving and the fact of revocation); State v. Jones, 231 Kan. 366 , 644 P.2d 464, 466 (1982) (holding that under driving while license suspended statute, once the State has complied with mandatory notice requirements by mailing, an irrebuttable presumption of receipt arises and thus the state does not need to prove that the defendant had actual receipt of notice, actual knowledge of revocation, or specific intent to violate the st…
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
STATE of Maine
v.
Kristoffer ANTONSEN
Supreme Judicial Court of Maine.
May 27, 1987.
525 A.2d 1048
R. Christopher Almy, Dist. Atty., Philip Worden, Asst. Dist. Atty., Bangor, for the State., Jay Otis, Cohen & Cohen, Bangor, for defendant.
McKusick, Nichols, Wathen, Glassman, Scolnik, Clifford.
Cited by 6 opinions  |  Published

MEMORANDUM OF DECISION.

Kristoffer Antonsen appeals from a judgment of the Superior Court, Penobscot County, entered on a jury verdict finding him guilty of operating a motor vehicle after the suspension of his license to drive in violation of 29 M.R.S.A. § 2184 (Supp. 1986). We find no merit in his claim that the violation of section 2184 requires actual notice of the suspension and a culpable mental state. See 29 M.R.S.A.[*1049] § 2184(1)(D); 17-A M.R.S.A. § 34(5)(B) (1983); State v. Kovtuschenko, 521 A.2d 718 (Me.1987).

The entry is:

Judgment affirmed.

All concurring.