Zanki v. Cahill, 812 N.E.2d 1257 (NY 2004). · Go Syfert
Search
Zanki v. Cahill, 812 N.E.2d 1257 (NY 2004). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
11 citation events (11 in the last 25 years) across 2 distinct courts.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Enisa Zanki Et Al., Appellants,
v.
Gerald K. Cahill Et Al., Defendants, and Cushman & Wakefield, Inc., Defendant and Third-Party Plaintiff-Respondent. California JKC Properties, Inc., Third-Party Defendant-Respondent, Et Al., Third-Party Defendants
New York Court of Appeals.
May 11, 2004.
812 N.E.2d 1257
APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL, Robert A. Skoblar, New York City, for appellants., Wilson, Bave, Conboy, Cozza & Couzens, P.C., White Plains 0James A. Rogers of counsel), for defendant, third-party plaintiff-respondent and third-party defendant-respondent.
Kaye and Judges G.B. Smith, Ciparick, Rosenblatt, Graffeo, Read and R.S. Smith Concur.
Cited by 10 opinions  |  Published

OPINION OF THE COURT

Memorandum.

The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed with costs.

The Appellate Division properly determined that plaintiffs failed to raise a triable issue of fact whether the alleged injuries resulted from a dangerous recurring condition of which defendant Cushman & Wakefield had actual or constructive notice.

Chief Judge Kaye and Judges G.B. Smith, Ciparick, Rosenblatt, Graffeo, Read and R.S. Smith concur.

On review of submissions pursuant to section 500.4 of the Rules of the Court of Appeals (22 NYCRR 500.4), order affirmed, with costs, in a memorandum.