Bochner v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd., 180 F.2d 1021 (3rd Cir. 1950). · Go Syfert
Search
Bochner v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd., 180 F.2d 1021 (3rd Cir. 1950). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
2 citation events across 1 distinct court.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
BOCHNER Et Al.
v.
NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD
10062_1.
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit.
Mar 21, 1950.
180 F.2d 1021
Geoffrey J. Cunniff, Philadelphia, Pa. (Marcus Manoff, Philadelphia, Pa., on the brief), for petitioners., William E. Colby, Washington, D. C. (David P. Findling, Associate Gen. Counsel, A. Norman Somers, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Bernard Dunau, Washington, D. C., on the brief), for respondent.
Biggs, Hastie, Lederle, Per Curiam.
Cited by 2 opinions  |  Published
PER CURIAM.

We have examined with care the briefs and the record in this case. The points involved were argued at length by able counsel. There was substantial evidence in the record to support the conclusions of the National Labor Relations Board that the petitioners coerced their employees in t'he exercise of rights guaranteed to them by Section 7 of the National Labor Relations Act, 29 U.S.C.A. § 157, and discriminated in their employment to the end that membership in the union might be discouraged. The Board’s order is correct in every respect. A decree, in the usual form, enforcing the Board’s order in full may be submitted.