discussed Cited as authority (rule) Summagraphics Corp. v. United States Moreover, it is well settled that a stay of proceedings may be granted for duplicative litigation only “where two cases between the same parties on the same cause of action are commenced in two different Federal courts....”, Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority v. Frank Ragonese, et al., 617 F.2d 828, 830 (D.C.Cir.1980), quoted in Food Fair Stores, Inc. v. Square Deal Market Co., 187 F.2d 219, 220 (D.C.Cir.1951).

discussed Cited as authority (rule) Cenergy Corporation v. Bryson Oil & Gas P.L.C. Exxon Corp. v. United States, 655 F.2d 1112 , 1116 n. 5 (Temp.Emer.Ct.App.1981); Cessna Aircraft Co. v. Brown, 348 F.2d 689, 692 (10th Cir.1965); Food Fair Stores, Inc. v. Square Deal Market Co., Inc., 187 F.2d 219, 220 (D.C.Cir.1950); Tele-Wine, Inc. v. Foremost Sales Promotions, 510 F.Supp. 1341, 1343 (S.D.N.Y.1981); Montclair Electronics, Inc. v. Electra/Midland Corp., 326 F.Supp. 839, 843 (S.D.N.Y.1971).

discussed Cited as authority (rule) Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority v. Frank Ragonese, D/B/A Square Construction Company and La Fera Contracting Company Speed Products Co. v. Tinnerman, 83 U.S.App.D.C. 243, 245 , 171 F.2d 727, 729 (D.C.Cir.1948), quoted in Food Fair Stores, Inc. v. Square Deal Market Co., 88 U.S.App.D.C. 176, 177 , 187 F.2d 219, 220 (D.C.Cir.1951).

examined Cited "see" Columbia Plaza Corporation v. Security National Bank (3×) See Food Fair Stores, Inc. v. Square Deal Market, Inc., 88 U.S.App.D.C. 176, 177 , 187 F.2d 219 , 220 (1954); Mattel, Inc. v. Louis Marx & Co., 353 F.2d 421, 424 (2d Cir. 1965), cert. dismissed, 384 U.S. 948 , 86 S.Ct. 1475 , 16 L.Ed.2d 546 (1966); Remington Prods.