green
Positive treatment
7.4 score
Treatment trajectory · 2009 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
2009
2017
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 7 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "see"
Com. v. Vera, R.
See Commonwealth v. Bostick, 958 A.2d 543, 561 (Pa. Super. 2008) (finding sufficient evidence of constructive possession of a controlled substance where police officers observed the defendant engaging in separate transactions with buyers who were later found in possession of a controlled substance), appeal denied, 987 A.2d 158 (Pa. 2009).
discussed
Cited "see"
Com. v. Holman, R.
(2×)
See Commonwealth v. Bostick, 958 A.2d 543, 560 (Pa. Super. 2008), appeal denied, 987 A.2d 158 (Pa. 2009).
discussed
Cited "see"
Com. v. Garnett, R.
(2×)
See Commonwealth v. Bostick, 958 A.2d 543, 560 (Pa. Super. 2008), appeal denied, 987 A.2d 158 (Pa. 2009).
discussed
Cited "see"
Vetter, J. and Jones, A. v. Miller, A.
See Braun v. Target Corp., 983 A.2d 752, 760 (Pa. Super. 2009), appeal denied, *952 604 Pa. 701 , 987 A.2d 158 (2009); Gallagher v. Ing, 367 Pa.Super. 346 , 532 A.2d 1179, 1182-83 (1987), appeal denied, 519 Pa. 665 , 548 A.2d 255 (1988). 5 We extended this rule of admissibility to evidence tending to establish intoxication on the part of a pedestrian.
cited
Cited "see"
Com. v. Wolf, P.
See Commonwealth v. Bostick, 958 A.2d 543, 551-552 (Pa. Super. 2008), appeal denied, 987 A.2d 158 (Pa. 2009).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Coughlin, A. v. Massaquoi, U.
See Gallagher v. Ing, 367 Pa.Super. 346 , 532 A.2d 1179 , 1183 (1987), appeal denied, 519 Pa. 665 , 548 A.2d 255 (1988) ( "The 'other' evidence necessary to render admissible a blood alcohol content in excess of .10 percent, it has been held, may consist of expert testimony interpreting the significance of the results of blood alcohol tests with respect to unfitness to drive.") (citation omitted); see also Braun v. Target Corp., 983 A.2d 752 , 760 (Pa.Super.2009), appeal denied, 604 Pa. 701 , 987 A.2d 158 (2009) ("Corroborative evidence to establish intoxication can be in the form of expert te…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Coughlin, A. v. Massaquoi, U.
See Gallagher v. Ing, 532 A.2d 1179, 1183 (Pa.Super. 1987), appeal denied, 548 A.2d 255 (Pa. 1988) (“The ‘other’ evidence necessary to render admissible a blood alcohol content in excess of .10 percent, it has been held, may consist of expert testimony interpreting the significance of the results of blood alcohol tests with respect to unfitness to drive.”) (citation omitted); see also Braun v. Target Corp., 983 A.2d 752, 760 (Pa.Super. 2009), appeal denied, 987 A.2d 158 (Pa. 2009) (“Corroborative evidence to establish intoxication can be in the form of expert testimony, indicating th…
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
COM.
v.
BAILEY.
v.
BAILEY.
446 WAL (2009).
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.
Dec 30, 2009.
987 A.2d 158
Published
Disposition of Petition for Allowance of Appeal Denied.