Mary A. Riley, Adm'x of the Est. of Frank L. Riley, Deceased v. S. Transp. Co., 192 F.2d 391 (2d Cir. 1951). · Go Syfert
Mary A. Riley, Adm'x of the Est. of Frank L. Riley, Deceased v. S. Transp. Co., 192 F.2d 391 (2d Cir. 1951). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
89 citation events (23 in the last 25 years) across 9 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: VHC, Inc. v. CIR (ca7, 2020-08-06)
Treatment trajectory · 1951 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1951 1988 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 9 distinct citers. How cited ↗
examined Cited as authority (quoted) VHC, Inc. v. CIR
7th Cir. · 2020 · signal: see · quote attribution · 1 verbatim quote · confidence high
intrafamily transactions are subject to rigid scrutiny .... however, this presumption may be rebutted by an affirma- tive showing that there existed at the time of the transaction a real expectation of repayment and intent to enforce the collec- tion of the indebtedness.
examined Cited as authority (quoted) VHC, Inc. v. CIR
7th Cir. · 2020 · signal: see · quote attribution · 1 verbatim quote · confidence high
intrafamily transactions are subject to rigid scrutiny .... however, this presumption may be rebutted by an affirma- tive showing that there existed at the time of the transaction a real expectation of repayment and intent to enforce the collec- tion of the indebtedness.
cited Cited "see" Christopher Michael Dufresne v. Commissioner
Tax Ct. · 2019 · signal: see · confidence high
See Estate of Van Anda v. Commissioner, 12 T.C. 1158 , 1162 (1949), aff’d per curiam, 192 F.2d 391 (2d Cir. 1951).
cited Cited "see" VHC, Inc. v. Comm'r
Tax Ct. · 2017 · signal: see · confidence high
See Estate of Van Anda v. Commissioner , 12 T.C. 1158 , 1162 (1949) , aff'd per curiam , 192 F.2d 391 (2d Cir. 1951) .
discussed Cited "see" MCFADDEN v. COMMISSIONER
Tax Ct. · 2002 · signal: see · confidence high
See Estate of Van Anda v. Commissioner, 12 T.C. 1158 (1949) , affd. per curiam 192 F.2d 391 (2d Cir. 1951) . *192 Some of the factors we consider when determining whether there is a debtor-creditor relationship with a reasonable expectation of repayment are whether: (1) There is a note or other evidence of indebtedness; (2) interest is charged; (3) there is a fixed schedule for repayment; (4) security or collateral is requested; (5) there is any written loan agreement; (6) a demand for repayment has been made; (7) the parties' records reflect the transaction as a loan; (8) repayments have been…
cited Cited "see" Kidder v. Commissioner
Tax Ct. · 1999 · signal: see · confidence high
See Estate of Van Anda v. Commissioner, 12 T.C. 1158 , 1162 (1949) , *405 affd. 192 F.2d 391 (2d Cir. 1951) .
discussed Cited "see" Mann Constr. Co. v. Commissioner
Tax Ct. · 1999 · signal: see · confidence high
See Estate of Van Anda v. Commissioner, 12 T.C. 1158 (1949) , affd. per curiam 192 F.2d 391 (2d Cir. 1951) . *240 To determine whether a debtor-creditor relationship with a reasonable expectation of repayment exists, we consider, among other factors, whether: 1.
cited Cited "see, e.g." Peimani v. Comm'r
Tax Ct. · 2011 · signal: see also · confidence low
Id. ; see also Estate of Van Anda v. Commissioner , 12 T.C. 1158 , 1162 (1949) , affd. 192 F.2d 391 (2d Cir. 1951) .
cited Cited "see, e.g." Sizelove
unknown court · Joh · signal: see also · confidence low
Id. ; see also Estate of Van Anda v. Commissioner , 12 T.C. 1158 , 1162 (1949) , affd. 192 F.2d 391 (2d Cir. 1951) .
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Mary A. Riley, Administratrix of the Estate of Frank L. Riley, Deceased
v.
Southern Transp. Co.
22135.
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit.
Nov 21, 1951.
192 F.2d 391

192 F.2d 391

Mary A. RILEY, Administratrix of the Estate of Frank L.
Riley, deceased, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
SOUTHERN TRANSP. CO., Defendant-Appellee.

No. 76, Docket 22135.

United States Court of Appeals Second Circuit.

Argued Nov. 8, 1951.
Decided Nov. 21, 1951.

Solomon Goodman, New York City, for appellant.

Nelson, Healy, Baillie & Burke, New York City, Allen A. Baillie, New York City, of counsel, for appellee.

Before SWAN, Chief Judge, FRANK, Circuit Judge and COXE, District Judge.

PER CURIAM.

1

Judgment affirmed as to the first cause of action on the opinion below, D.C., 90 F.Supp. 842. The second cause of action has been discontinued by stipulation.