W & L Sales Co., Inc. v. WCAB, 574 A.2d 603 (Pa. 1990). · Go Syfert
Search
W & L Sales Co., Inc. v. WCAB, 574 A.2d 603 (Pa. 1990). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
12 citation events across 2 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Kiebler v. Workers' Compensation Appeal Board (pacommwct, 1999-09-17)
Top citers, strongest first. 1 distinct citer. How cited ↗
examined Cited "see" Kiebler v. Workers' Compensation Appeal Board (4×)
Pa. Commw. Ct. · 1999 · signal: see · confidence high
See W & L Sales Co. v. Workmen’s Compensation Appeal Board (Drake), 123 Pa.Cmwlth. 158 , 552 A.2d 1177 (1989), aff'd without opinion, 524 Pa. 591 , 574 A.2d 603 (1990) (where an employee, unbeknownst to the employer, had returned to work and was overpaid compensation, the employer, whose supersedeas request had been denied, had a remedy in the Supersedeas Fund, rather than in recovering the overpayment from claimant’s future benefit checks).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
W & L SALES CO., INC., and PMA Insurance Company, Appellants,
v.
WORKMEN'S COMPENSATION APPEAL BOARD and Toby L. Drake.
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.
May 23, 1990.
574 A.2d 603
Nix, C.J., and Larsen, Flaherty, McDermott, Zappala, Papadakos and Cappy.
Published

Dennis J. Bonetti, Harrisburg, for appellants.

Gerard M. Mackarevich, Ira H. Weinstock, Ronald L. Calhoon, Harrisburg, for appellee.

Before NIX, C.J., and LARSEN, FLAHERTY, McDERMOTT, ZAPPALA, PAPADAKOS and CAPPY, JJ.

ORDER

PER CURIAM:

Order affirmed.

FLAHERTY, McDERMOTT and PAPADAKOS, JJ., dissent.