Singer Steel Co. v. Joseph Turk Mfg. Co., 202 F.2d 154 (6th Cir. 1953). · Go Syfert
Search
Singer Steel Co. v. Joseph Turk Mfg. Co., 202 F.2d 154 (6th Cir. 1953). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
9 citation events across 7 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Solon Decorating Company v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, Sidney Zehman and Irene Zehman v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, Milton Wolf and Roslyn Wolf v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue (ca6, 1958-03-13)
Top citers, strongest first. 2 distinct citers. How cited ↗
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Solon Decorating Company v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, Sidney Zehman and Irene Zehman v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, Milton Wolf and Roslyn Wolf v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue
6th Cir. · 1958 · signal: see also · confidence low
See also, N. A. Woodworth Co. v. Kavanagh, D.C.E.D.Mich.1952, 102 F.Supp. 9 , affirmed 6 Cir., 1953, 202 F.2d 154 . 3 Although the petitioners' argument is not without force, this court has already clearly determined the issues against them, as indicated above.
cited Cited "see, e.g." Solon Decorating Co. v. Commissioner
6th Cir. · 1958 · signal: see also · confidence low
See also, N. A. Woodworth Co. v. Kavanagh, D.C.E.D.Mich. 1952, 102 F.Supp. 9 , affirmed 6 Cir., 1953, 202 F.2d 154 .
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
SINGER STEEL COMPANY, Appellant,
v.
JOSEPH TURK MANUFACTURING COMPANY, Appellee
11663_1.
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit.
Feb 12, 1953.
202 F.2d 154
Ezra Z. Shapiro and Joseph H. Persky, Cleveland, Ohio, for appellant., Halle, Haber, Bericlc & McNulty, Cleveland, Ohio, for appellee.
Allen, Martin, Miller, Per Curiam.
Published
PER CURIAM.

In this case, a judgment for $17,955, with interest, was awarded appellee as damages against the defendant for conversion of a quantity of steel which was the property of appellee and known by appellant to be such according to substantial evidence adduced;

And it appearing from a consideration of the record, the briefs of the attorneys and their oral arguments, that the judgment was properly awarded upon the basis of[*155] the findings of fact of the District Court, which were supported by substantial evidence and were certainly not clearly erroneous ;

And it appearing further that the conclusions of law of the district judge were logically drawn and that his opinion reasoned to correct conclusions, stated therein;

The judgment of the District Court is affirmed.