Com. v. Dooley, 30 A.3d 487 (Pa. 2011). · Go Syfert
Search
Com. v. Dooley, 30 A.3d 487 (Pa. 2011). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
G Cite
cited 6× by 6 distinct cases · “It is well-settled that issues not raised in a PCRA petition cannot be considered on appeal.”
121 citation events (121 in the last 25 years) across 3 distinct courts.
Treatment trajectory · 2011 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
2011 2018 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 23 distinct citers. How cited ↗
discussed Cited as authority (quoted) Com. v. Kress, J.
Pa. Super. Ct. · 2016 · signal: see · quote attribution · 1 verbatim quote · confidence high
it is well-settled that issues not raised in a pcra petition cannot be considered on appeal.
discussed Cited as authority (quoted) Com. v. Moser, L.
Pa. Super. Ct. · 2016 · signal: see also · quote attribution · 1 verbatim quote · confidence low
before a court will find ineffectiveness of counsel for failing to file a direct appeal, the petitioner must prove that he requested a direct appeal and the counsel disregarded the request.
discussed Cited "see" Com. v. Otero-Ruiz, K.
Pa. Super. Ct. · 2025 · signal: see · confidence high
See Commonwealth v. Ousley, 21 A.3d 1238, 1242 (Pa.Super. 2011), appeal denied, 612 Pa. 698 , 30 A.3d 487 (2011) (reiterating that issues not raised in PCRA petition cannot be considered on appeal). -7- J-S17042-25 code of judicial conduct but fails to discuss in any way how the court did so. 7 Appellant’s brief entirely fails to support his issues with meaningful discussion, references to the record, and citations to relevant authority.
discussed Cited "see" Com. v. Haymes, L.
Pa. Super. Ct. · 2020 · signal: see · confidence high
See Commonwealth v. Ousley, 21 A.3d 1238, 1242 (Pa.Super. 2011) (reiterating that “issues not raised in a PCRA petition cannot be considered on appeal” (citation omitted)), appeal denied, 30 A.3d 487 (Pa. 2011).
discussed Cited "see" Com. v. Brown, M.
Pa. Super. Ct. · 2019 · signal: see · confidence high
See Commonwealth v. Ousley, 21 A.3d 1238, 1242 (Pa.Super. 2011) (stating, “issues not raised in a PCRA petition cannot be considered on appeal.” (citations omitted)), appeal denied, 30 A.3d 487 (Pa. 2011). -5- J.
discussed Cited "see" Com. v. Cupitt, R.
Pa. Super. Ct. · 2019 · signal: see · confidence high
See Commonwealth v. Ousley, 21 A.3d 1238, 1242 (Pa. Super. 2011) (legality of sentencing claim involving merger doctrine could not be addressed for first time on appeal where claim was not presented in PCRA petition or otherwise litigated before PCRA court), appeal denied, 30 A.3d 487 (Pa. 2011).
cited Cited "see" Com. v. Kushner, A.
Pa. Super. Ct. · 2019 · signal: see · confidence high
See Commonwealth v. Kushner, 30 A.3d 487 (Pa. 2011) (Table).
discussed Cited "see" Com. v. Nelson, D.
Pa. Super. Ct. · 2018 · signal: see · confidence high
See Commonwealth v. Ousley, 21 A.3d 1238, 1242 (Pa. Super. 2011) (illegal sentencing claim raised in PCRA petition and presented before PCRA court is preserved for appellate review), appeal denied, 30 A.3d 487 (Pa. 2011).
discussed Cited "see" Com. v. Reid, S.
Pa. Super. Ct. · 2018 · signal: see · confidence high
See Commonwealth v. Ousley, 21 A.3d 1238, 1242 (Pa. Super. 2011) (“It is well-settled that ‘issues not raised in a PCRA petition cannot be considered on appeal.’) (quotation omitted), appeal denied , 30 A.3d 487 (Pa. 2011).
cited Cited "see" Com. v. Cargile, B.
Pa. Super. Ct. · 2018 · signal: see · confidence high
Appellant’s Brief at 28; see N.T., 9/2/14, 108-110. - 11 - J-S21028-18 Commonwealth v. Ousley, 21 A.3d 1238, 1242 (Pa. Super. 2011), appeal denied, 30 A.3d 487 (Pa. 2011).
cited Cited "see" Com. v. Maxwell, T.
Pa. Super. Ct. · 2017 · signal: see · confidence high
See Commonwealth v. Ousley, 21 A.3d 1238, 1242 (Pa.Super. 2011), appeal denied, 612 Pa. 698 , 30 A.3d 487 (2011) (explaining issues not raised in PCRA petition cannot be considered on appeal).
cited Cited "see" Com. v. Kushner, A.
Pa. Super. Ct. · 2017 · signal: see · confidence high
See Commonwealth v. Kushner, 23 A.3d 573 (Pa. Super. 2010) (unpublished memorandum), appeal denied, 30 A.3d 487 (Pa. 2011).
cited Cited "see" Com. v. Crossan, J.
Pa. Super. Ct. · 2016 · signal: see · confidence high
See Commonwealth v. Crossan, 26 A.3d 1202 (Pa.Super. 2011), appeal denied, 612 Pa. 696 , 30 A.3d 487 (2011).
cited Cited "see" Com. v. Heleva, D.
Pa. Super. Ct. · 2016 · signal: see · confidence high
See id.
discussed Cited "see" Com. v. Veon, M.
Pa. Super. Ct. · 2015 · signal: see · confidence high
See Commonwealth v. Ousley, 21 A.3d 1238 (Pa.Super. 2011), appeal denied, 612 Pa. 698 , 30 A.3d 487 (2011) (reiterating issues not raised in PCRA petition cannot be considered on appeal); Commonwealth v. Wallace, 533 A.2d 1051 (Pa.Super. 1987) (explaining constitutional issues are waived if not raised and preserved at all levels of adjudication).
discussed Cited "see" Com. v. Green, A.
Pa. Super. Ct. · 2015 · signal: see · confidence high
See Hill, supra. Next, “[i]t is well-settled that ‘issues not raised in a PCRA petition cannot be considered on appeal.’” Commonwealth v. Ousley, 21 A.3d 1238, 1242 (Pa. Super. 2011), appeal denied, 30 A.3d 487 (Pa. 2011), quoting Commonwealth v. Lauro, 819 A.2d 100, 104 (Pa. Super. 2003), appeal denied, 830 A.2d 975 (Pa. 2003).
discussed Cited "see" Com. v. Foye, I.
Pa. Super. Ct. · 2014 · signal: see · confidence high
See generally Commonwealth v. Ousley, 21 A.3d 1238, 1242 (Pa. Super. 2011) (citation omitted) (stating, “issues not raised in a PCRA petition cannot be considered on appeal[]”), appeal denied, 30 A.3d 487 (Pa. 2011).
discussed Cited "see" Commonwealth v. Allen
Pa. Super. Ct. · 2012 · signal: see · confidence high
See Commonwealth v. Ousley, 21 A.3d 1238 , 1241 n. 2 (Pa.Super.2011), appeal denied, 30 A.3d 487 (Pa.2011) (holding that incarcerated petitioner’s pro se PCRA petition deemed filed as of date handed to prison officials pursuant to Prisoner Mailbox Rule). .Appellant had filed a pro se PCRA petition on January 27, 2010 that the court declined to consider because of the pending direct appeal.
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Com. v. Robinson, J.
Pa. Super. Ct. · 2018 · signal: see also · confidence low
See also Commonwealth v. Ousley, 21 A.3d 1238, 1245 (Pa.Super. 2011), appeal denied, 612 Pa. 698 , 30 A.3d 487 (2011) (stating Pitts prohibits this Court’s review of petitioner’s ineffectiveness of PCRA counsel claim, where issue was raised for first time in PCRA appeal).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Com. v. Evans, E.
Pa. Super. Ct. · 2017 · signal: see also · confidence low
See also Commonwealth v. Ousley, 21 A.3d 1238, 1245 (Pa.Super. 2011), appeal denied, 612 Pa. 698 , 30 A.3d 487 (2011) (stating Pitts prohibits appellate review of any ineffectiveness of counsel claim, if issue is raised for first time in PCRA appeal).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Com. v. Metz, C.
Pa. Super. Ct. · 2017 · signal: see also · confidence low
See also Commonwealth v. Ousley, 21 A.3d 1238, 1245 (Pa.Super. 2011), appeal denied, 612 Pa. 698 , 30 A.3d 487 (2011) (stating Pitts prohibits this Court’s review of petitioner’s ineffectiveness of PCRA counsel claim, where issue was raised for first time in PCRA appeal).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Com. v. Guarrasi, J.
Pa. Super. Ct. · 2016 · signal: see also · confidence low
See Pa.R.A.P. 302(a); Pa.R.A.P. 1925(b)(4)(vii); Commonwealth v. Melendez– Rodriguez, 856 A.2d 1278, 1287 (Pa. Super. 2004) (en banc) (holding issues raised for first time in 1925(b) statement waived); accord Commonwealth. v. Tejada, 107 A.3d 788, 790 (Pa. Super. 2015); see also Commonwealth v. Ousley, 21 A.3d 1238, 1242 (Pa. Super. 2011) (“It is well-settled that issues not raised in a PCRA petition cannot be considered on appeal.”) (internal quotation marks and citation omitted), appeal denied, 30 A.3d 487 (Pa. 2011).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Com. v. Burris, P.
Pa. Super. Ct. · 2016 · signal: see also · confidence low
PCRA Court’s Rule 1925(a) Opinion, 6/30/15, at 4, 6-7; see Pa.R.A.P. 302(a); Pa.R.A.P. 1925(b)(4)(vii); Commonwealth v. Melendez–Rodriguez, 856 A.2d 1278, 1287 (Pa. Super. 2004) (en banc) (holding issues raised for first time in 1925(b) statement waived); accord Commonwealth. v. Tejada, 107 A.3d 788, 790 (Pa. Super. 2015); see also Commonwealth v. Ousley, 21 A.3d 1238, 1242 (Pa. Super. 2011) (“It is well-settled that issues not raised in a PCRA petition cannot be considered on appeal.”) (internal quotation marks and citation omitted), appeal denied, 30 A.3d 487 (Pa. 2011).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
COM.
v.
DOOLEY.
219 WAL (2011).
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.
Sep 27, 2011.
30 A.3d 487
Published
2 passages pin-cited by 2 cases
Pinpoint authority: #42,058 of 633,719
Citer courts: Superior Court of Pennsylvania (2)

Disposition of Petition for Allowance of Appeal Denied.