green
Positive treatment
3.9 score
Top citers, strongest first. 2 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
cited
Cited "see"
State v. Thompson
See State v. Thompson , 128 Conn. App. 296 , 298, 17 A.3d 488 (2011), cert. denied, 303 Conn. 928 , 36 A.3d 241 (2012).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Gray
This court, however, has held that ‘‘[m]istaken inter- pretation can be minimized at the trial by permitting testimony on the issue . . . .’’ (Internal quotation marks omitted.) State v. Fox, supra, 192 Conn. App. 240 ; see also State v. Thompson, 128 Conn. App. 296, 304 , 17 A.3d 488 (2011), cert. denied, 303 Conn. 928 , 36 A.3d 241 (2012).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Misiti, LLC, Et Al.
v.
Travelers Property Casualty Company of America Et Al.
v.
Travelers Property Casualty Company of America Et Al.
SC 18915.
Supreme Court of Connecticut.
Jan 25, 2012.
Jack G. Steigelfest, in support of the petition., Paul G. Roche, in opposition.
Published
The plaintiffs’ petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 132 Conn. App. 629 (AC 33243), is granted, limited to the following issue:
“Did the Appellate Court properly determine that the trial court improperly granted the plaintiffs’ motion for[*931] summary judgment and denied the named defendant’s motion for summary judgment?”Decided January 25, 2012 The Supreme Court docket number is SC 18915. Jack G. Steigelfest, in support of the petition. Paul G. Roche, in opposition.