Dennis Surratt v. United States, 210 F.2d 731 (D.C. Cir. 1954). · Go Syfert
Dennis Surratt v. United States, 210 F.2d 731 (D.C. Cir. 1954). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
1 citation event across 1 distinct court.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Dennis Surratt
v.
United States
11860.
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit.
Feb 25, 1954.
210 F.2d 731
Published

210 F.2d 731

93 U.S.App.D.C. 415

Dennis SURRATT, Appellant,
v.
UNITED STATES of America, Appellee.

No. 11860.
United States Court of Appeals,
District of Columbia Circuit.

Argued Feb. 17, 1954.
Decided Feb. 25, 1954.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Columbia.

[93 U.S.App.D.C. 416] Mr. Dominic A. St. Angelo, Washington, D.C., with whom Mr. Anthony J. Brosco was on the brief, for appellant.

Mr. Samuel J. L'Hommedieu, Jr., Asst. U.S. Atty., Washington, D.C., with whom Messrs. Leo A. Rover, U.S. Atty., and Lewis A. Carroll and Arthur J. McLaughlin, Asst. U.S. Attys., Washington, D.C., were on the brief, for appellee. Mr. William J. Peck, Asst. U.S. Atty., Washington, D.C., at time record was filed, entered an appearance for appellee.

Before EDGERTON and FAHY, Circuit Judges, and RICHMOND B. KEECH, District Judge sitting by designation.

PER CURIAM.

1

Appellant complains of the admission of certain evidence and the use that was made of it. We find no prejudicial error.

2

Affirmed.