Desert Mountain Props. Ltd. P'ship v. Liberty Mut. Fire Ins. Co., 250 P.3d 196 (Ariz. 2011). · Go Syfert
Search
Desert Mountain Props. Ltd. P'ship v. Liberty Mut. Fire Ins. Co., 250 P.3d 196 (Ariz. 2011). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
“the successful party is the one that is the 'ultimate 22 prevailing party' in the litigation.”
27 citation events (27 in the last 25 years) across 6 distinct courts.
Treatment trajectory · 2012 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
2012 2019 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 1 distinct citer. How cited ↗
discussed Cited as authority (quoted) Infante v. Namecheap Incorporated
D. Ariz. · 2025 · quote attribution · 1 verbatim quote · confidence low
the successful party is the one that is the 'ultimate 22 prevailing party' in the litigation.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
DESERT MOUNTAIN PROPERTIES LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, Plaintiff/Appellee/Cross-Appellant,
v.
LIBERTY MUTUAL FIRE INSURANCE COMPANY, Defendant/Appellant/Cross-Appellee
CV-10-0339-PR.
Arizona Supreme Court.
May 12, 2011.
250 P.3d 196
Fennemore Craig, P.C. By J. Randall Jefferies, Timothy Berg, Theresa Dwyer-Federhar, Louis D. Lopez, Meredith K. Marder, Phoenix, Attorneys for Desert Mountain Properties Limited Partnership., David Bell & Associates, P.L.L.C. By David M. Bell, Howard L. Andari, Phoenix, Attorneys for Liberty Mutual Fire Insurance Company., Haralson, Miller, Pitt, Feldman & McAnally, P.L.C. By Stanley G. Feldman, Tucson, Poli & Ball, P.L.C. By Michael N. Poli, Phoenix, Knapp & Roberts, P.C. By David L. Abney, Scottsdale, Attorneys for Amici Curiae Arizona Association for Justice/Arizona Trial Lawyers Association and United Policyholders., Lewis and Roca, L.L.P. By Randy S. Papetti, Phoenix, Attorneys for Amicus Curiae Complex Insurance Claims Litigation Association.
Berch, Hurwitz, Bales, Pelander, Brutinel.
Cited by 4 opinions  |  Published
1 passage pin-cited by 1 case
Pinpoint authority: bottom 77%
Citer courts: D. Arizona (1)

OPINION

BERCH, Chief Justice.

¶ 1 We granted review in this ease to consider (1) whether a commercial general liability (CGL) policy covers an insured’s contractual liability for damage that caused only economic loss, (2) whether the CGL policy’s contractual liability exclusion applies only when an insured has “assumed” another’s liability by agreeing to indemnify or hold another harmless, and (3) whether an insured’s voluntary expenditures to repair property damage caused by construction defects resulted from a “legal obligation” to pay “damages.” We have jurisdiction under Article 6, Section 5(3) of the Arizona Constitution and A.R.S. § 12-120.24 (2003).

¶ 2 After considering the briefs and oral arguments, the Court affirms the opinion of the court of appeals on these issues for the reasons set forth therein.

CONCURRING: ANDREW D. HURWITZ, Vice Chief Justice, W. SCOTT BALES, A. JOHN PELANDER and ROBERT M. BRUTINEL, Justices.