Harold J. Byberg, Libelant-Appellant v. Stand. Oil Co. of New Jersey, Guillermo H. Reyes, Libelant-Appellant v. United States, 223 F.2d 412 (2d Cir. 1955). · Go Syfert
Search
Harold J. Byberg, Libelant-Appellant v. Stand. Oil Co. of New Jersey, Guillermo H. Reyes, Libelant-Appellant v. United States, 223 F.2d 412 (2d Cir. 1955). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
1 citation event across 1 distinct court.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Harold J. Byberg, Libelant-Appellant
v.
Standard Oil Company of New Jersey, Guillermo H. Reyes, Libelant-Appellant v. United States
23428_1.
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit.
May 24, 1955.
223 F.2d 412
Published

223 F.2d 412

Harold J. BYBERG, Libelant-Appellant,
v.
STANDARD OIL COMPANY OF NEW JERSEY, Respondent-Appellee.
Guillermo H. REYES, Libelant-Appellant,
v.
UNITED STATES of America, Respondent-Appellee.

Nos. 303, 282. Dockets 23428, 23377.

United States Court of Appeals Second Circuit.

Argued May 4, 5, and May 6, 1955.
Decided May 24, 1955.

Nathan Baker, Hoboken, N.J. (Baker, Garber & Chazen, Hoboken, N.J., of counsel, Bernard Chazen, Hoboken, N.J., on the brief), proctor for libelant-appellant Harold J. Byberg.

Kirlin, Campbell & Keating, New York City (Walter X. Connor and Vernon Sims Jones, New York City, Advocates), proctors for respondent-appellee Standard Oil Co. of New Jersey.

Murray A. Miller, New York City, for libelant-appellant Guillermo H. Reyes.

Hanrahan & Brennan, New York City (Michael E. Hanrahan, New York City, of counsel, (for respondent-appellee United States of America.

Before CLARK, Chief Judge, MEDINA, Circuit Judge, and DIMOCK, District judge.

PER CURIAM.

1

Each of these cases involves the validity of a release signed by a seaman, and in each the trial judge, by the application of proper standards, Garrett v. Moore-McCormack Co., 1942, 317 U.S. 239, 63 S.Ct. 246, 87 L.Ed. 239, appraised the proofs before him and found as a fact that the release was voluntarily executed by the seaman, with full knowledge of his rights, and for a reasonable consideration. These findings are amply supported by the record in each case, and we shall not disturb them.

2

Affirmed.