Alice Barnes v. Philip Fears, 224 F.2d 279 (6th Cir. 1955). · Go Syfert
Search
Alice Barnes v. Philip Fears, 224 F.2d 279 (6th Cir. 1955). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
4 citation events across 2 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Alvin H. Frankel, Administrator Ad Prosequendum of the Estate of Lynn E. Hoyt, Deceased v. Hohns-Manville Corporation, Turner Construction Company. The Belmont Iron Works (Third Party Defendant) v. Ralph Cornell, Inc (ca3, 1958-08-11)
Top citers, strongest first. 2 distinct citers. How cited ↗
discussed Cited "see" Alvin H. Frankel, Administrator Ad Prosequendum of the Estate of Lynn E. Hoyt, Deceased v. Hohns-Manville Corporation, Turner Construction Company. The Belmont Iron Works (Third Party Defendant) v. Ralph Cornell, Inc
3rd Cir. · 1958 · signal: see · confidence high
See Frankel v. Johns-Manville Corp. (Turner Construction Co.) 3 Cir., 1955, 224 F.2d 279 . 2 At the present stage of the litigation Turner seeks to recover what it paid on this judgment from Belmont Iron Works.
cited Cited "see" Frankel v. Johns-Manville Corp.
3rd Cir. · 1958 · signal: see · confidence high
See Frankel v. Johns-Manville Corp. (Turner Construction Co.) 3 Cir., 1955, 224 F.2d 279 .
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Alice BARNES Et Al., Appellants,
v.
Philip FEARS Et Al., Appellees
12326.
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit.
May 6, 1955.
224 F.2d 279
Howard I. Chesler, Cleveland, Ohio, for appellants., Joseph L. Newman and Albert A. Gil-man, Cleveland, Ohio, for appellee.
Martin, McALLISTER, Per Curiam, Stewart.
Published
PER CURIAM.

This appeal by defendants, from the judgment of the district court in favor of the four plaintiffs awarding each of them amounts representing over-charges by the appellant landlords, has been duly heard and considered upon the record and upon the briefs and oral arguments of attorneys for the parties;

From which it appears that the findings of fact of the district court are supported by substantial evidence, its conclusions of law are correctly drawn, and its memorandum opinion, 132 F.Supp. 352, is reasoned to a correct result;

Accordingly, the judgment of the district court is affirmed; and it is so ordered.