Max Tendler v. Nick Basiliko, 231 F.2d 516 (D.C. Cir. 1956). · Go Syfert
Search
Max Tendler v. Nick Basiliko, 231 F.2d 516 (D.C. Cir. 1956). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
8 citation events across 1 distinct court.
Strongest positive: T.V.T. Corp. v. Basiliko (cadc, 1958-04-24)
Top citers, strongest first. 2 distinct citers. How cited ↗
discussed Cited "see" T.V.T. Corp. v. Basiliko (2×)
D.C. Cir. · 1958 · signal: see · confidence high
See Tendler v. Basiliko, 1956, 97 U.S.App.D.C. 357 , 231 F.2d 516 .
discussed Cited "see" Corporation v. Basiliko (2×)
D.C. Cir. · 1958 · signal: see · confidence high
See Tendler v. Basiliko, 1956, 97 U.S.App.D.C. 357 , 231 F.2d 516 .
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Max TENDLER, Appellant,
v.
Nick BASILIKO Et Al., Appellees
12899.
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit.
Mar 29, 1956.
231 F.2d 516
Mr. Max Tendler, Washington, D. C., appellant pro se., Mr. J. Zitomer, Washington, D. C., filed a brief for appellant., Mr. Harry L. Ryan, Jr., Washington, D. C., with whom Mr. Roger J. White-ford, Washington, D. C., was on the brief, for appellees Basiliko.
Miller, Washington, Danaher.
Cited by 2 opinions  |  Published
PER CURIAM.

This appeal, in essence, represents an effort by appellant to obtain relief from the terms of agreements and stipulations which he made as a result of his in[*517] volvement in an unfortunate real estate transaction. The questions presented were carefully considered at hearings held before three Judges of the District Court on successive motions of the parties. All concluded that appellant was not entitled to relief. We agree. The judgment appealed from will be

Affirmed.