Lind-Larsen v. Fleet Nat'l Bank of Connecticut, 861 A.2d 514 (Conn. 2004). · Go Syfert
Search
Lind-Larsen v. Fleet Nat'l Bank of Connecticut, 861 A.2d 514 (Conn. 2004). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
49 citation events (49 in the last 25 years) across 2 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. v. Cam (connappct, 2017-05-02)
Treatment trajectory · 2004 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
2004 2015 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 11 distinct citers. How cited ↗
discussed Cited "see" JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. v. Cam (2×)
Conn. App. Ct. · 2017 · signal: see · confidence high
See Lind-Larsen v. Fleet National Bank of Connecticut , 84 Conn.App. 1 , 19, 852 A.2d 799 (stipulated judgment not real estate contract), cert. denied, 271 Conn. 940 , 861 A.2d 514 (2004).
discussed Cited "see" Connecticut National Mortgage Co. v. Knudsen (2×)
Conn. · 2016 · signal: see · confidence high
See Lind - Larsen v. Fleet National Bank of Connecticut , 84 Conn.App. 1 , 3 n.1, 852 A.2d 799 , cert. denied, 271 Conn. 940 , 861 A.2d 514 (2004).
discussed Cited "see" State v. O'Bryan
Conn. · 2015 · signal: see · confidence high
See id., 559–60 (considering whether sufficient evidence of combat by agreement existed when defendant claimed that he was mere bystander who had intervened in defense of another person). 13 To this end, we note that § 53a-19, like much of our state’s Penal Code, is modeled heavily after coordinate provisions of New York’s Penal Code; although principles stated in the Model Penal Code are also informative in its interpretation.
cited Cited "see" Alldred v. Alldred
Conn. App. Ct. · 2011 · signal: see · confidence high
See LaMacchia v. Chilinsky, 85 Conn. App. 1, 4 , 856 A.2d 459 , cert. denied, 271 Conn. 942 , 861 A.2d 514 (2004).
discussed Cited "see" Barber v. Barber (2×)
Conn. App. Ct. · 2009 · signal: see · confidence high
See Lind-Larsen v. Fleet National Bank of Connecticut, 84 Conn. App. 1, 17-18 , 852 A.2d 799 , cert. denied, 271 Conn. 940 , 861 A.2d 514 (2004).
discussed Cited "see" State v. McCarroll
Conn. App. Ct. · 2009 · signal: see · confidence high
See LaMacchia v. Chilinsky, 85 Conn. App. 1, 6-7 , 856 A.2d 459 (res judicata bars court from considering same basis for relief regarding child support arrearages as asserted in prior proceeding), cert. denied, 271 Conn. 942 , 861 A.2d 514 (2004); Fish v. Igoe, 83 Conn. App. 398, 404 , 849 A.2d 910 (res judicata precluded relitigation of child support issue “pertaining to a past proceeding”), cert. denied, 271 Conn. 921 , 859 A.2d 577 (2004).
discussed Cited "see" Terry v. Terry
Conn. App. Ct. · 2007 · signal: see · confidence high
See LaMacchia v. Chilinsky, 85 Conn. App. 1 , 6 n.4, 856 A.2d 459 (plaintiff should have requested continuance from court on issue if he desired to reargue motion on further inquiry), cert. denied, 271 Conn. 942 , 861 A.2d 514 (2004).
cited Cited "see" Gager v. Sanger
Conn. App. Ct. · 2006 · signal: see · confidence high
See id.
discussed Cited "see" State v. Janulawicz
Conn. App. Ct. · 2006 · signal: see · confidence high
See State v. Abraham, 84 Conn. App. 551, 561 , 854 A.2d 89 (“[assignments of error which are merely mentioned but not briefed beyond a statement of the claim will be deemed abandoned and will not be reviewed by this court” [internal quotation marks omitted]), cert. denied, 271 Conn. 938 , 861 A.2d 514 (2004). 4 It is uncontested that, subsequent to the defendant’s arrest, Duren signed a written consent to search form.
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Thunelius v. Posacki
Conn. App. Ct. · 2019 · signal: see also · confidence low
As subsequently noted in this opinion, however, we find the sanction problematic for reasons relating to the court’s authority to award fees generally. 9 ‘‘The appointment of a guardian ad litem, specifically authorized by General Statutes § 45a-132 (a), is governed by the same standards as those pertaining to an attorney for minor children, and the standards regarding payment of fees are the same for both categories.’’ Greenan v. Greenan, supra, 150 Conn. App. 306 n.12; see also Lamacchia v. Chilinsky, 79 Conn. App. 372 , 375 n.3, 830 A.2d 329 (2003) (‘‘[w]e note that although …
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Bross v. Hillside Acres, Inc. (2×)
Conn. App. Ct. · 2006 · signal: see also · confidence low
“In count nine of the plaintiffs substitute complaint, paragraphs seven through twelve, the plaintiff alleged the following damages: a right leg fracture; blood clots; severe shock to his entire nervous system; severe physical, mental and emotional distress; extreme pain and suffering; depression; lethargy; loss of appetite; nervousness; fear of death; embarrassment; limitation of activities; inconvenience; disability; limitation of motion; the inability to perform household, recreational and normal duties, activities and functions; lost wages; permanent partial destruction of earning capaci…
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Lisa LIND-LARSEN
v.
FLEET NATIONAL BANK OF CONNECTICUT et al.
Supreme Court of Connecticut.
Nov 4, 2004.
861 A.2d 514
Published

Lisa Lind-Larsen, pro se, in support of the petition.

Craig S. Taschner and Michelle D. Sensale, Hartford, in opposition.

The plaintiff's petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 84 Conn.App. 1, 852 A.2d 799 (2004), is denied.