neutral
Cited (no substantive treatment)
0.3 score
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Mrs. Madeliene Twinam THOMAS, Appellant,
v.
J. R. CHAMBERLAIN Et Al., Appellees
v.
J. R. CHAMBERLAIN Et Al., Appellees
12689.
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit.
Jun 27, 1956.
Roberts & Weill, Chattanooga, Tenn., Frank M. Gleason, Rossville, Ga., for appellant., Ellis K. Meacham and J. W. Anderson, Chattanooga, Tenn., for appellees.
Allen, McALLISTER, Miller, Per Curiam.
Published
PER CURIAM.
The above cause coming on to be heard upon the transcript of the record, the briefs of the parties, and the argument of counsel in open court, and the court being duly advised,
Now, therefore, it is ordered, adjudged, and decreed that the judgment of the district court be and is hereby affirmed upon the opinion of Judge Darr, 143 F. Supp. 671, sustaining appellees’ motion for a summary judgment, which was adopted by the district court as its findings of fact and conclusions of law.