United States v. Gennaro Salzano, 241 F.2d 849 (2d Cir. 1957). · Go Syfert
Search
United States v. Gennaro Salzano, 241 F.2d 849 (2d Cir. 1957). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
26 citation events across 15 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Peter Bay Owners Ass'n, Inc. v. Stillman (vid, 1999-07-15)
Treatment trajectory · 1957 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1957 1991 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 6 distinct citers. How cited ↗
discussed Cited as authority (rule) Peter Bay Owners Ass'n, Inc. v. Stillman
D.V.I. · 1999 · confidence medium
See Newfound Management Corp. v. Sewer, 885 F. Supp. 727, 749-50 (D.V.I. 1995), aff'd, 131 F.3d 108 (3d Cir. 1997); Red Hook Marina Corp. v. Antilles Yachting Corp., 478 F.2d 1273, 1275 (3d Cir. 1973); Kruger & Birch v. Du Boyce, 241 F.2d 849, 853 (3d Cir. 1957).
discussed Cited as authority (rule) Newfound Management Corp. v. Sewer (2×) also: Cited "see, e.g."
D.V.I. · 1995 · confidence medium
Since monuments or objects afford greater certainty than computations of courses or distances, the “true intention of the parties will more probably be ascertained by adopting the call for natural monuments.” Kruger & Birch, 241 F.2d at 853; see also U.S. v. Doyle, 468 F.2d 633, 636 (10th Cir.1972). 24 If a monument is obliterated the testimony of residents, witnesses, or other surveyors may reestablish its original location.
cited Cited as authority (rule) Graves v. United States
N.D.N.Y. · 1995 · confidence medium
United States v. Salzano, 241 F.2d 849, 849 (2d Cir.1957); see Campino v. United States, 968 F.2d 187, 189-90 (2d Cir.1992); United States v. Rodriguez, 444 F.Supp. 163, 164 (S.D.N.Y.1978).
discussed Cited as authority (rule) Show-World Center, Inc. v. Walsh
S.D.N.Y. · 1977 · confidence medium
While there is language in the two cases cited to the court by defendants which would tend to indicate that under some circumstances, the “privity of estate” between landlord and tenant may cause the latter to be bound by prior judgments to which the landlord only was a party, Kruger & Birch, Inc. v. DuBoyce, 241 F.2d 849, 854 (3rd Cir. 1957); Fouke v. Schenewerk, 197 F.2d 234, 236 (5th Cir. 1952) (dictum), those cases appear to involve only disputes relating to either title to, or right to possession of, real property.
discussed Cited "see" Southwest Airlines Company v. Texas International Airlines, Inc. v. Texas Aeronautics Commission, Intervenor-Appellee
5th Cir. · 1977 · signal: see · confidence high
Lab., 1934, 293 U.S. 1 , 54 S.Ct. 752 , 79 L.Ed. 163 , rehearing denied, 293 U.S. 522 , 55 S.Ct. 66 , 79 L.Ed. 634 ; see Kruger & Birch, Inc. v. Du Boyce, 3 Cir. 1957, 241 F.2d 849, 854 (lessee held in privity with lessor as to issue litigated before the lease); IB Moore’s Federal Practice j]0.411[l] nn. 13-20 (1965); 46 Am.
discussed Cited "see" United States of America Ex Rel. Joseph Marcial, A/K/A Joseph Johnson v. Edward M. Fay, Warden of Green Haven Prison (2×)
2d Cir. · 1957 · signal: see · confidence high
See, among others, United States v. Salzano, 2 Cir., 241 F.2d 849 ; United States v. Tacoma, 2 Cir., 176 F.2d 242 ; United States v. Page, 2 Cir., 229 F.2d 91 .
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
United States
v.
Gennaro Salzano
24061_1.
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit.
Mar 5, 1957.
241 F.2d 849
Published

241 F.2d 849

UNITED STATES of America, Appellee.
v.
Gennaro SALZANO, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 245, Docket 24061.

United States Court of Appeals Second Circuit.

Argued Feb. 5, 1957.
Decided March 5, 1957.

Paul W. Williams, U.S. Atty., S.D.N.Y., New York City (William K. Zinke, Asst. U.S. Atty., New York City, of counsel), for appellee.

Gennaro Salzano, pro se.

Before CLARK, Chief Judge, MEDINA, Circuit Judge, and J. JOSEPH SMITH, District Judge.

PER CURIAM.

[*~849]1

Appeal from denial of a second motion under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 to vacate a sentence of eight years' imprisonment on a plea of guilty to violation of the narcotic laws, 21 U.S.C. §§ 173, 174, as a second offender. Petitioner's claims of invalid search, illegal seizure of evidence and lack of proof are disposed of by his guilty plea. The information was properly filed. He was represented by counsel throughout the criminal proceedings. His attack on the sentence as a second offender is without substance. His claim that the court clerk was illegally practicing law in reading the information to him is nonsense. All petitioner's contentions were fully considered by Judge Kaufman and adequately discussed in his memorandum opinion dated February 3, 1956, D.C., 138 F.Supp. 72. We find no merit in the appeal.

[*~854]2

Affirmed.