Fred Williams v. John F. Mulcahey, Dist. Dir. of Immigr. & Naturalization at Detroit, Michigan, 253 F.2d 709 (6th Cir. 1958). · Go Syfert
Search
Fred Williams v. John F. Mulcahey, Dist. Dir. of Immigr. & Naturalization at Detroit, Michigan, 253 F.2d 709 (6th Cir. 1958). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
5 citation events across 2 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Niukkanen v. Mcalexander (ca9, 1959-05-19)
Top citers, strongest first. 2 distinct citers. How cited ↗
discussed Cited "see" Niukkanen v. Mcalexander
9th Cir. · 1959 · signal: see · confidence high
See Rowoldt v. Perfetto, supra, 355 U.S. at page 116 , 78 S. Ct. at page 181 . 2 See, also, Ocon v. Guercio, 9 Cir., 237 F.2d 177 , 179-180 3 The disadvantage to Mackie in his failure to rebut the testimony given by the government witnesses was called to his attention by the special inquiry officer, but Mackie persisted in his refusal to give further testimony 4 See, also, Williams v. Mulcahey, 6 Cir., 253 F.2d 709 ; Wellman v. Butterfield, 6 Cir., 253 F.2d 932 ; and Bong Youn Choy v. Barber, D.C.N.D.Cal., 162 F. Supp. 629 , all of which refer to Rowoldt v. Perfetto, but hold the evidence suff…
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Niukkanen v. McAlexander
9th Cir. · 1959 · signal: see also · confidence low
See, also, Williams v. Mulcahey, 6 Cir., 253 F.2d 709 ; Wellman v. Butterfield, 6 Cir., 253 F.2d 932 ; and Bong Youn Choy v. Barber, D.C.N.D.Cal., 162 F. Supp. 629 , all of which refer to Rowoldt v. Perfetto, but hold the evidence sufficient to sustain a deportation order.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Fred WILLIAMS, Appellant,
v.
John F. MULCAHEY, District Director of Immigration and Naturalization at Detroit, Michigan, Appellee
13119_1.
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit.
Apr 28, 1958.
253 F.2d 709
George W. Crockett, Jr., Goodman, Crockett, Eden & Robb, Detroit, Mich., for appellant., Fred W. Kaess, U. S. Atty., Dwight K. Hamborsky, Asst. U. S. Atty., Detroit, Mich., Charles Gordon, Regional Counsel, Immigration and Naturalization Service, St. Paul, Minn., for appellee.
McALLISTER, Miller, Per Curiam, Stewart.
Cited by 4 opinions  |  Published
PER CURIAM.

The appellant has filed a petition for a rehearing and stay of mandate in this case, pending the decision of the Supreme Court of the United States in Rowoldt v. Perfetto. That case has now been decided. 355 U.S. 115, 78 S.Ct. 180, 2 L.Ed. 2d 140..

In the present case the evidence showed that the appellant at various times between 1929 and 1949 was known as a “functionary” and an “organizer” in the Communist Party, that he was a member of the Party’s Michigan District Committee and District Bureau, that he was a delegate to national and Michigan conventions of the Party in 1934, and that he was a candidate for public office in Michigan on the Communist Party ballot. There was thus a substantial basis for finding that he committed himself to the Communist Party in consciousness that he was “joining an organization known as the Communist Party which operates as a distinct and active political organization * * *.” Galvan v. Press, 1954, 347 U.S. 522, 528, 74 S.Ct. 737, 741, 98 L.Ed. 911; Ro-woldt v. Perfetto, supra.

The petition for rehearing and stay of mandate is denied.