The Ry. Supply & Mfg. Co. v. Shawnee-Penn Mfg. Co., Inc., 255 F.2d 686 (3rd Cir. 1958). · Go Syfert
Search
The Ry. Supply & Mfg. Co. v. Shawnee-Penn Mfg. Co., Inc., 255 F.2d 686 (3rd Cir. 1958). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
8 citation events across 4 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: May v. State (alacrimapp, 1997-08-22)
Top citers, strongest first. 5 distinct citers. How cited ↗
cited Cited "see" May v. State
Ala. Crim. App. · 1997 · signal: see · confidence high
See United States v. Wilson , 158 F. Supp. 442 (M.D.Ala.), aff'd , 255 F.2d 686 (5th Cir.), cert. denied 358 U.S. 865 , 79 S.Ct. 97 , 3 L.Ed.2d 98 (1958).
discussed Cited "see" United States v. Zirpolo
3rd Cir. · 1971 · signal: see · confidence high
See United States v. Wilson, D.C., 158 F.Supp. 442 , affirmed, 5 Cir., 255 F.2d 686 . 10 Cf., the Jury Selection and Service Act of 1968, 28 U.S.C., Sec. 1863 (b) (2) which now specifically provides that the names of prospective jurors may be selected from voter registration lists or the lists of actual voters of the political subdivision within the district or division
cited Cited "see" United States v. Zirpolo
3rd Cir. · 1971 · signal: see · confidence high
See United States v. Wilson, D.C., 158 F.Supp. 442 , affirmed, 5 Cir., 255 F.2d 686 . .
discussed Cited "see" U.S. 57 (1961) HOYT v. FLORIDA (2×)
unknown court · signal: see · confidence high
See United States v. Wilson, 158 F. Supp. 442 , aff'd, 255 F. 2d 686 .
discussed Cited "see, e.g." United States v. Carey
5th Cir. · 1959 · signal: see also · confidence low
Grogan v. United States, 5 Cir., 1958, 261 F.2d 86 ; United States v. Holland, 5 Cir., 1957, 242 F.2d 248 , facts stated in Crosby v. United States, 5 Cir., 1956, 231 F.2d 679 , certiorari denied 352 U.S. 831 , 77 S.Ct. 46 , 1 L.Ed.2d 52 , rehearing denied 352 U.S. 955 , 77 S.Ct. 322 , 1 L.Ed.2d 245 (criminal action) ; Koenann v. United States, 5 Cir., 1956, 230 F.2d 662 (criminal action); see also United States v. Wilson, D.C.D.Ala.1957, 159 F.Supp. 149 , affirmed 255 F.2d 686 , certiorari denied 358 U.S. 865 , 79 S.Ct. 97 , 3 L.Ed.2d 98 (criminal action). .
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
The RAILWAY SUPPLY & MFG. CO.
v.
SHAWNEE-PENN MFG. CO., Inc., Appellant
12559.
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit.
Jun 13, 1958.
255 F.2d 686
Elias Magil, Philadelphia, Pa. (John Swartz, Philadelphia, Pa., on the brief), for appellant., Daniel Mungall, Jr., Philadelphia, Pa. (Stradley, Ronon, Stevens & Young, Philadelphia, Pa., on the brief), for appellee.
Maris, Goodrich, McLaughlin.
Cited by 1 opinion  |  Published
PER CURIAM.

This is an appeal by the defendant from a final judgment entered on a verdict in favor of the plaintiff in a civil action for damages for breach of a contract for the purchase of goods by the defendant from the plaintiff. Motions for a new trial and for judgment n. o. v. were denied. The defendant’s principal complaint on this appeal is that the verdict was against the weight of the evidence. The weight of the evidence was for the jury to determine, however, and we find no abuse of discretion on the part of the district court in refusing a new trial on this ground. The defendant also asserts that there were errors in the admission of evidence and in the charge to the jury. We have considered all these contentions but find them so insubstantial as not to require discussion here.

The judgment of the district court will be affirmed.