neutral
Cited (no substantive treatment)
0.2 score
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Manuel BRAUNSTEIN Et Al., T/A Power Produce Company, Appellants,
v.
Hunter SMITH Et Al., Appellees
v.
Hunter SMITH Et Al., Appellees
14434.
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit.
Nov 26, 1958.
Mr. Thomas S. Jackson, Washington, D. C., with whom Messrs. Robert M. ■Gray and Martin R. Fain, Washington, D. C., were on the brief, for appellants., Mr. Rex K. Nelson, Washington, D. C., with whom Mr. Eugene X. Murphy, Washington, D. C., was on the brief, for .appellees.
Reed, Bazelon, Fahy.
Published
PER CURIAM.
The appeal by defendant is from a .judgment entered upon a jury verdict in favor of plaintiffs for damages due to injuries suffered in an automobile collision. The question is essentially whether it was reversible error for the trial court to refuse to instruct the jury, as requested, with respect to a certain minor aspect of the evidence. In the context of the case as a whole we think the failure so to instruct did not constitute reversible error.
Affirmed.