Turnknett v. Keaton, 266 F.2d 572 (5th Cir. 1959). · Go Syfert
Search
Turnknett v. Keaton, 266 F.2d 572 (5th Cir. 1959). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
6 citation events (1 in the last 25 years) across 4 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Karl Rove & Company v. Richard Thornburgh, Richard Thornburgh, Cross-Appellee, and Raymond P. Dimuzio, Defendant-Cross-Appellee (ca5, 1994-11-30)
Top citers, strongest first. 1 distinct citer. How cited ↗
discussed Cited as authority (rule) Karl Rove & Company v. Richard Thornburgh, Richard Thornburgh, Cross-Appellee, and Raymond P. Dimuzio, Defendant-Cross-Appellee
5th Cir. · 1994 · confidence medium
See Walker v. Armco Steel Corp., 446 U.S. 740, 745 , 100 S.Ct. 1978, 1982 , 64 L.Ed.2d 659 (1980) (discussing Erie R.R. v. Tompkins, 304 U.S. 64 , 58 S.Ct. 817 , 82 L.Ed. 1188 (1938)); Ayo v. Johns-Manville Sales Corp., 771 F.2d 902, 909 n. 4 (5th Cir.1985) ("[W]hen a federal court exercises diversity jurisdiction, the court must apply the law of the forum state ... and when the state court has spoken ... clearly ... we are bound to follow that ruling.”); Turknett v. Keaton, 266 F.2d 572, 572 (5th Cir.1959) (per curiam) (stating that in diversity case, federal courts cannot alter settled law…
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
H. H. Turnknett, Suing as Next Friend for His Minor Daughter, Tresa Lynn Turknett
v.
H. G. Keaton and Grady Acuff, D/B/A Three League Gin Company of Lamesa, Texas
17535.
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit.
Apr 23, 1959.
266 F.2d 572
Cited by 3 opinions  |  Published

266 F.2d 572

H. H. TURNKNETT, suing as next friend for his minor daughter, Tresa Lynn Turknett, Appellant,
v.
H. G. KEATON and Grady Acuff, d/b/a Three League Gin Company of Lamesa, Texas, Appellees.

No. 17535.

United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit.

April 23, 1959.

Thomas A. Sneed, John J. Watts, Odessa, Tex., for appellant.

Jack Little, James Little, Elton Gilliland, Big Spring, Tex., Little & Gilliland, Big Spring, Tex., of counsel, for appellees.

Before TUTTLE, CAMERON and WISDOM, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

1

This appeal presents the single question whether the trial court correctly held that no cause of action arises under Texas law for injuries to an unborn child.

2

Appellant concedes that the only Texas decisions, Magnolia Coca Cola Bottling Co. v. Jordan, 124 Tex. 347, 78 S.W.2d 944, 97 A.L.R. 1513, and Lewis v. Steves Sash & Door Company, Tex. Civ.App., 177 S.W.2d 350 (writ refused), have held that no such cause of action arises. Contending that the trend of modern decisions in other jurisdictions is towards a more liberal rule, appellant asks us to hold that the Texas Court would today adopt a different rule. Under the principle of Erie R. Co. v. Tompkins, 304 U.S. 64, 58 S.Ct. 817, 82 L.Ed. 1188, we cannot do this. In a diversity case we are bound to apply to local law on substantive matters. See Polk County, Ga. v. Lincoln Nat. Life Insurance Society, 5 Cir., 262 F.2d 486.

3

The judgment is affirmed.