Felix De Boisblanc v. Chester A. Usry, Dist. Dir. of Internal Revenue, 272 F.2d 111 (5th Cir. 1959). · Go Syfert
Search
Felix De Boisblanc v. Chester A. Usry, Dist. Dir. of Internal Revenue, 272 F.2d 111 (5th Cir. 1959). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
1 citation event across 1 distinct court.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Felix DE BOISBLANC, Appellant,
v.
Chester A. USRY, District Director of Internal Revenue, Appellee
17815.
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit.
Dec 31, 1959.
272 F.2d 111
H. Charles Korn, New Orleans, La., for appellant., John J. Pajak, Atty., Dept. of Justice, Washington, D. C., Lloyd Cyril Melancon, Asst. U. S. Atty., New Orleans, La., Charles K. Rice, Asst. Atty. Gen., Lee A. Jackson, Loring W. Post, Charles B. E. Freeman, Attys., Dept. of Justice, Washington, D. C., M. Hepburn Many, U. S. Atty., New Orleans, La., for appellee.
Tuttle, Brown, Wisdom.
Cited by 1 opinion  |  Published
PER CURIAM.

The only issue in this case is whether the rebuilding of automobile engines by the taxpayer constituted manufacturing under Section 3403(c) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1939, 26 U.S.C.A. § 3403 (c) requiring imposition of the manufacturer’s excise tax upon the sales of the rebuilt engines. This Court decided the same question adversely to the taxpayer in Hartley v. United States, 5 Cir., 1958, 252 F.2d 262. See also Hackendorf v. United States, 10 Cir., 1957, 243 F.2d 760, certiorari denied 355 U.S. 826, 78 S.Ct. 36, 2 L.Ed.2d 40.

The decision is

Affirmed.