United States Air Conditioning Corp. v. Frank Fogel, Shirley Fogel, Rhawn Realty, Inc., Harry Fogel & Beatrice Fogel, 272 F.2d 879 (3rd Cir. 1969). · Go Syfert
United States Air Conditioning Corp. v. Frank Fogel, Shirley Fogel, Rhawn Realty, Inc., Harry Fogel & Beatrice Fogel, 272 F.2d 879 (3rd Cir. 1969). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
3 citation events across 2 distinct courts.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
UNITED STATES AIR CONDITIONING CORPORATION
v.
Frank FOGEL, Shirley Fogel, Rhawn Realty, Inc., Harry Fogel and Beatrice Fogel
12957.
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit.
Dec 15, 1969.
272 F.2d 879
Irwin Paul, Phildelphia, Pa. (Alfred M. Klein, Philadelphia, Pa., on the brief), for appellants Harry and Beatrice Fogel, and Rhawn Realty, Inc., Harold E. Kohn, Philadelphia, Pa. (William T. Coleman, Jr., Dilworth, Pax-son, Kalish, Kohn & Dilks, Philadelphia, Pa., on the brief), for appellee.
Kalodner, Staley, Hastie.
Cited by 3 opinions  |  Published
PER CURIAM.

This is an appeal from an order granting a preliminary injunction. The injunction merely restrains the defendants pendente lite from accelerating rent under the terms of a lease in a situation where plaintiff has refused to pay current installments of rent, alleging that it is entitled to apply and set off this current rent against an amount the defendants are said to owe the plaintiff in eon-[*880] nection with the transactions of the parties concerning the rented property. The injunction protects the defendants by requiring that the plaintiff pay the rent as due from month to month into the registry of the court. The plaintiff is also required to pay interest on the amounts thus withheld from defendants at six per cent per annum for the period of such withholding. We have examined the record and are satisfied that the preliminary injunction as issued represents a fair, reasonable and correct exercise of equitable discretion. This conclusion disposes of the one and only question which is properly before us on this appeal.

The judgment will be affirmed.