green
Positive treatment
0.9 score
Top citers, strongest first. 1 distinct citer.
How cited ↗
cited
Cited "see"
Cole v. United States
See in this connection Jupiter v. United States, 287 F.2d 388 (5th Cir.); Christopher v. United States, D.C., 237 F.Supp. 787 (1); Land v. United States, D.C., 231 F.Supp. 883 .
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Ervin JUPITER and Edward Levy Metals, Inc., Appellants,
v.
UNITED STATES of America, Appellee
v.
UNITED STATES of America, Appellee
18622_1.
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit.
Feb 24, 1961.
Julian B. Humphrey, David C. Treen, New Orleans, La., for appellant., Francis G. Weller, Asst. U. S. Atty., New Orleans, La., M. Hepburn Many, U. S. Atty., New Orleans, La., for appel-lee.
Tuttle, Brown, Clayton.
Cited by 4 opinions | Published
PER CURIAM.
This appeal in a federal tort claims action presents only issues of fact. The record discloses that there was ample evidence to support the finding of the trial court that the appellant Jupiter was guilty of contributory negligence and that such contributory negligence continued to the occurrence of the mishap which produced the injury from which he suffered. See Jupiter v. United States, D.C., 181 F.Supp. 294.
Although the strict application of the contributory negligence doctrine works a hardship on tort claim litigants in Alabama in contrast to other states where the rule of comparative negligence applies, we are bound to apply the law of the pláce of injury in such a case.
The judgment must be affirmed.